News and Editorials
The testing of
SUSE Linux 10.1 is in
the final stages. Following the recent release of its second beta, three
more development releases are scheduled to appear over the next three weeks
before the new version is declared stable. It will then be formally
released - after a delay required to package the usual SUSE retail boxes
and to update the printed documentation. This means that, barring some last
minute package upgrades and bug fixes, the latest SUSE beta is close to
what the final release will look like. So what can we look forward to in
March? And how does the result of this intensive development process
compare with the upcoming Fedora Core 5, due for release at roughly the
same time as SUSE 10.1?
Having recently investigated
the second test release of Fedora 5, my testing of SUSE Linux 10.1 beta2
started with a deficit on the first impressions barometer. Firstly, unlike
Fedora Core, SUSE doesn't offer a DVD edition of its beta releases, so
testers need to download and burn five CD images (or three if a basic
installation with KDE and/or GNOME is sufficient). Yes, there are smaller
delta ISOs, but these are only really useful on a SUSE installation since
they require the "deltarpm" package, only available in SUSE Linux.
Secondly, the Fedora developers usually produce comprehensive and
well-written release notes, accessible also from within the installation
program, with details about the changes and any known issues users might
experience. This is especially important during beta testing in order to
prevent testers from reporting known issues as bugs and to waste time
discussing them on mailing lists. Yes, SUSE does provide a changelog, but
it is just a dry list of package and feature updates in chronological
order, while the beta2 release notes, barely a page long, mention little
beyond the origin of Agama, an African lizard that gave the
release its code name.
On to the installation. Unlike Anaconda in Fedora 5, the SUSE installer has
been subjected to only light modifications. The first obvious one is a
screen allowing the user to perform a media check to ensure that the
installation CD/DVD images are not defective. The second notable change is
the removal of a "default" when choosing the desktop environment.
Historically, SUSE has always given clear preference to KDE over GNOME, but
Novell, with its eye on the enterprise desktop and with many GNOME
applications under its umbrella, wants to see the simpler interface of
GNOME promoted to at least equal status. As such, the user has to make an
explicit decision between GNOME and KDE (or choose a text-only or minimal
graphical system). In the partitioning stage, formatting partitions with
the XFS file system is no longer supported and the choice of journaling
file systems is limited to ReiserFS (default) and ext3.
One of the applications frequently mentioned in SUSE's release announcements
and developer blogs, even more so than in Fedora's, is NetworkManager. This
is a Red Hat-initiated GNOME program that should, at least in theory, take
the pain out of re-configuring networks on mobile computers that access the
Internet in varied locations. On the latest SUSE release, this is not
turned on by default (at least it wasn't on the desktop system I installed
SUSE on), but it can be enabled during installation. In this case it will
seamlessly integrate into the system trays of both the GNOME panel and KDE
Kicker. Although still considered a work in progress, NetworkManager is a
promising tool with a potential to beat other operating systems in ease of
network re-configuration. Incidentally, an excellent article about the
present status and features of this application was recently published in
Red
Hat Magazine.
On the desktop, in sharp contrast with Fedora Core 5, there is little
evidence of any significant changes - except perhaps for the presence of
the Beagle desktop search tools, which now installs by default. Naturally,
most applications have been updated to their latest versions; among the major
components, SUSE's second beta ships with kernel 2.6.16-rc1, X.Org 6.9, KDE
3.5.1, OpenOffice.org 2.0.1rc2, Firefox 1.5 and Apache 2.2.0. Xen has also
been updated to 3.0. Interestingly, the developers have decided to stay
with the stable GNOME 2.12, instead of moving on to the current beta
release of 2.14 - wisely so, given the fact that SUSE 10.1 will be
finalized before March 15th, the expected release date of the new GNOME. As
in Fedora 5, SUSE's latest beta also includes glibc 2.3.90 and GCC 4.1.0 -
both are testing versions, but both carry major enhancements that are
likely to shape the development work of other distributions throughout
2006.
All in all, there isn't much new in SUSE 10.1 to get terribly excited about.
Sure, there is the usual: a cutting-edge kernel, update packages and
improved hardware support, but it seems that most of the work has been put
into general polish of the product, rather than major feature enhancements.
It is entirely possible that SUSE Linux will be used as a basis for the new
versions of both SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) and Novell Linux
Desktop (NLD), as the current stable releases of both have now become
somewhat long in the tooth.
How do Fedora 5 and SUSE 10.1 compare at this late stage of development? To
tell the truth, there isn't much to justify recommending one over another.
If anything, in terms of features and available packages, the two
distributions have been converging - they both ship with five CDs worth of
programs and both seem to copy the best features from each other (e.g.
Beagle, introduced into SUSE several releases ago is now part of Fedora
Core, while the Red Hat-sponsored NetworkManager is being talked up by SUSE
as a major new feature). After the recent simplifications of Anaconda,
Fedora is perhaps easier to install, but it still lacks a comprehensive
YaST-like central administration tool. The convenience of YaST is perhaps
one point that could sway certain users to SUSE. On the other hand, some
might consider the presence of a modular X.Org 7.0 and familiar SELinux in
Fedora an advantage over the monolithic X.Org 6.9 and less widely-used
AppArmor in the latest SUSE. In the end, however, the choice of one over
the other will probably come down to personal preference, rather than major
differences in features or quality.
Comments (7 posted)
New Releases
The second alpha release of NexentaOS (Debian on top of the Solaris kernel)
is out. Lots of work has been done on this release - it has 829 additional
packages. Highlights include wireless network support, KDE, Mono, Java,
and more.
Full Story (comments: none)
SUSE Linux 10.1 Codename "Agama Lizard" Beta2 is ready for testing. Click
below to see some known issues. SUSE Linux 10.1 supports the Intel and AMD
x86 and x86-64 platforms as well as the PowerPC platform.
Full Story (comments: none)
Distribution News
The Ubuntu Distro Sprint is currently underway at a hotel in London. This
is where developers are squashing bugs, updating packages, writing
documentation, and otherwise working on the Dapper Drake, aka Ubuntu 6.04.
Here's a summary of the activities during
day 1
& 2 and
day 3.
Comments (none posted)
Ben Collins has made his
daily kernel
builds available to Ubuntu users. These kernels are for test purposes
and should not be considered stable. The primary purpose of these kernels
is finer grained regression analysis between major kernel uploads.
Full Story (comments: none)
The opensuse.org website has been updated to MediaWiki version 1.5, which
allows the hosting of localized instances. The wiki is currently available
in English, Spanish, French and German. Further translations are planned.
Full Story (comments: none)
Distribution Newsletters
The Debian Weekly News for January 31, 2006 covers the donation of two MIPS
boards, more GPLv3 discussion, Debian Day call for papers, the removal of
debmake, more ways for volunteers to contribute to Debian, Debian archive
key maintenance, launchpad for Debian?, and other topics.
Full Story (comments: none)
This week the
Fedora Weekly
News covers Red Hat Magazine January 2006, Fedora Projects Weekly
Report 2006-01-30, Fedora Reloaded Episode 4 Podcast, Fedora Core 5 Test 2
Screencast, My desktop OS: Fedora Core 3: Feedback, Unofficial Fedora Core
Starter Guide, and several other topics.
Comments (none posted)
The
Gentoo
Weekly Newsletter for January 30, 2006 looks at modular X as it moves
into testing, an end of life announcement for old-style configuration
Apache packages, Gentoo's PHP Herd meeting, MySQL packages that support
SLOTing will be moving into testing, and more.
Comments (none posted)
The
DistroWatch
Weekly for January 30, 2006 is out. "
We'll start with news about
rPath, a Linux distribution and company, formally launched last week after
concluding a round of venture capital financing. Which Windows applications
would you most like to see running under Linux? That's what Novell wants to
know -- with some preliminary results of the survey already available -- in
order to help with porting them to our favourite operating system. This
will be followed by more news about Xandros, Morphix, and SUSE, as well as
a link to a mouthwatering bunch of KDE 4 screenshots. In our First Look
series, we'll check out the progress the developers of Symphony OS have
made during the last three months."
Comments (none posted)
Package updates
Updates for Fedora Core 4:
SDL (enable ALSA
output by default),
system-config-soundcard
(add log for kudzu, text clean-up),
iptraf
(fix bad display of frames).
Comments (none posted)
Updates for Mandriva Linux 2006.0:
dynamic
(call scripts correctly when hardware is plugged/unplugged),
gthumb (bug fix),
libgphoto (bug fix),
mozilla-thunderbird (bug fixes)
Updates for Multi Network Firewall 2.0: mdkonline (connect to mandrivaonline.com not
mandrivaonline.net),
Comments (none posted)
Newsletters and articles of interest
NewsForge
hears
from a long-time Windows user who finds Ubuntu's Breezy Badger to be a
pretty good replacement. "
Ubuntu's pre-installed GNOME applications
were suitable for my needs. OpenOffice.org allowed me to manipulate all my
Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files without any difficulty. It lacks some of
the extra features of the commercial competition, but I didn't suffer at
all in my early use. Switching from Quickbooks to GnuCash was more
difficult. GnuCash has fewer familiar features than Quickbooks, but free
software fits into my budget nicely."
Comments (none posted)
Distribution reviews
Linux.com
reviews
OpenWrt, the GPLed Linux distribution for wireless routers. "
Now
you have OpenWrt on your router - so what? OK. You're cool. You have Linux
running on your router. So what? So a lot more than I ever would have
imagined, that's for sure. Putting OpenWrt on your router is like adding
the magic sauce that can turn your ordinary router into something
special. A lot of different something specials, actually."
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page: Development>>