Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
GNU virtual private Ethernet
"this corrects a minor defect in the previous version, wherein interrupting the reshaping task would cause all data in the array to be lost."
This must be some new meaning of the word 'minor' I've never encountered before.
MD "minor" defects.
Posted Jan 26, 2006 11:39 UTC (Thu) by Duncan (guest, #6647)
Posted Jan 26, 2006 13:41 UTC (Thu) by ewan (subscriber, #5533)
Posted Jan 26, 2006 20:39 UTC (Thu) by guinan (subscriber, #4644)
Actually, I can see how minor it is...
Posted Jan 26, 2006 13:43 UTC (Thu) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)
Posted Jan 26, 2006 23:40 UTC (Thu) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359)
Further, once the code is finished, fully reviewed and fully tested (which is still a little way off), I don't see that you data would be any less safe during a reshape then it is during a resync.
Posted Jan 28, 2006 1:48 UTC (Sat) by pimlott (guest, #1535)
Posted Jan 28, 2006 14:07 UTC (Sat) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
Posted Jan 28, 2006 17:10 UTC (Sat) by pimlott (guest, #1535)
Posted Jan 28, 2006 16:26 UTC (Sat) by corbet (editor, #1)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds