Posted Jan 26, 2006 5:50 UTC (Thu) by lm (guest, #6402)
[Link]
One of the mistakes I've made in the past was to engage with every random person who came along and challenged what I said. I just don't have the time to repeat that mistake over and over.
If you have something substantive to say, I'll consider it and reply if I can say something useful. If you are just flaming (which forgive me for saying, it appears that you are doing) then I'll pass. My apologies, I know my track record is to dive right in there but I've got a lot of other stuff going on.
git
Posted Jan 26, 2006 6:13 UTC (Thu) by kirkengaard (subscriber, #15022)
[Link]
Consider me laughing at you for your role-reversal attempt.
Consider it to be the first purely emotion-driven comment from me in this exchange.
I understand that you can't say something useful in rebuttal. I understood it before I got the whole lm username reference. You being someone in real life hasn't changed that.