GPLv3: a first look

GPLv3: a first look

Posted Jan 17, 2006 17:27 UTC (Tue) by gravious (subscriber, #7662)
In reply to: GPLv3: a first look by Ross
Parent article: GPLv3: a first look

I don't know how to separate bugs from spyware, but if it doesn't do so already that distinction should be made.

I dunno either but I'm guessing intentionality. Maybe that concept could be used.

As to the draft itself - I like it! It's bold, provocative, targeted. Someone mentioned that it is a bit terse. We need terse (as in a lack of ambiguity). If the poster meant terse as in a bit dry or humour-lacking then now is the time to humanise it. May I point out as well that if there are any areas of wording in the document that are causing a lot of argument peolple should remember that a clarification of any disagreements could lead to a tightening up of the language in the final draft. We need unity on this. Roll on January 2007!

---

(Log in to post comments)