| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
GPLv3: a first lookGPLv3: a first lookPosted Jan 17, 2006 17:27 UTC (Tue) by gravious (guest, #7662)In reply to: GPLv3: a first look by Ross Parent article: GPLv3: a first look
I don't know how to separate bugs from spyware, but if it doesn't do so already that distinction should be made.I dunno either but I'm guessing intentionality. Maybe that concept could be used. As to the draft itself - I like it! It's bold, provocative, targeted. Someone mentioned that it is a bit terse. We need terse (as in a lack of ambiguity). If the poster meant terse as in a bit dry or humour-lacking then now is the time to humanise it. May I point out as well that if there are any areas of wording in the document that are causing a lot of argument peolple should remember that a clarification of any disagreements could lead to a tightening up of the language in the final draft. We need unity on this. Roll on January 2007!
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||