| |||||||||||||
Novell releases AppArmorNovell releases AppArmorPosted Jan 13, 2006 21:05 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Novell releases AppArmor by davecb Parent article: Novell releases AppArmor
Well, yes, except that in SELinux all security policies are applied to types (which are a labelling scheme of sorts, therefore). This means that you end up needing a *lot* of types and a massive tangle of relationships between files, types, and security policies...
... I can see that it's more flexible than AppArmor, but ye gods is it also more complex, and TBH most of us just don't need that complexity.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||