Seconded
Posted Jan 11, 2006 6:13 UTC (Wed) by
xoddam (subscriber, #2322)
In reply to:
Source availability by sbishop
Parent article:
The Grumpy Editor's Obviously Incorrect 2006 Predictions
Same here, though I haven't *extended* my subscription just yet
(Christmas cc bills...). If only I actually *was* a project leader...
that would involve pulling out my own finger.
Duncan, your threat of withdrawing your subscription is childish in the
extreme. You subscribe to the content of the LWN publication; if you
want the site code published that is completely separate work and you
should offer Jon professional rates to do the job properly rather than
having a tantrum.
On the other hand, Jon, Duncan is right to point out that the site code
was promised long ago and is still 'coming soon'. Three years ago it
might have been cutting-edge and gathered a significant developer
community; at this point (while it is still a delightfully clean
interface) there are blog servers galore out there which have somewhat
stolen the limelight from a developer's perspective.
Rather than challenging you to put Duncan's money where his mouth is,
I'll simply request that you conduct a straw poll on a timetable for
eventual release of the site code. I'll tempt fate by suggesting an
initial 'all rights reserved' subscriber-only release to assist in the
security audit phase. It will be no surprise if you prefer not to do
such a thing.
Incidentally, there appears to be no licence granted by Eklektix for
copying of LWN content. Is LWN content published on an 'all rights
reserved' basis or have I missed a licence somewhere?
(
Log in to post comments)