| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Hardware features
Hardware features
Posted Jan 7, 2006 17:00 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)In reply to: the non-free kernel module issue will come to a head by wilck
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's Obviously Incorrect 2006 Predictions
I just don't believe that day is near, and I don't share the views of some who think the Linux developer community has the power to impose their will to both a bunch of really heavyweight companies and to the large group of pragmatic users who want their hardware to "just work" with all the features they have paid for.You are right. One alternative is to pay for less features -- e.g. just use the onboard video cards which come integrated on many motherboards these days. Many people don't really care about bleeding-edge 3d features. The result: less high-end customers for ATI and nVidia.
But if Linux on the desktop has any significance, people will just want their damn 3d things to work right, binary modules or no binary modules. This is true today and hardware vendors know it, or they wouldn't be shipping binary Linux modules to begin with. So they will have no choice but to open their drivers.
(Log in to post comments)
Hardware features
Posted Jan 12, 2006 21:54 UTC (Thu) by wilck (subscriber, #29844) [Link]
So they will have no choice but to open their drivers.
That's the part I don't believe. The closed source drivers cost the vendors no more than a few developers. I have no idea if it pays off for them sales-wise, but it's a relatively cheap thing to do. Opening up the source is an entirely different issue. They may have licenced other companies' patented code, and they fear the loss of competitive advantage like hell. Most probably the non-free driver is some sort of cross-platform code, and they are afraid of opening up portions being also part of the Windows driver.
There are other devices out there, like cheap software RAID controllers, which need a proprietary driver top operate their disks in RAID mode. In this case, open-source RAID solutions being readily available, it makes no sense whatsoever to protect the code. Releasing binary drivers and keeping up to date with kernel development and different distributions, OTOH, causes their manufacturers big headaches. Yet they don't even think about opening up the source. And people buy their products (even OEMs who claim to support Linux) because they're a few cents cheaper than others. That's how it goes, I fear.
Still being pessimistic.