| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Source availabilitySource availabilityPosted Jan 7, 2006 4:14 UTC (Sat) by csamuel (✭ supporter ✭, #2624)In reply to: Source availability by corbet Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's Obviously Incorrect 2006 Predictions
Fearless leader wrote: But when it is put next to keeping the content flowing and figuring out out how to keep LWN alive, spending a week getting a source distribution together just hasn't risen toward the top of the list yet. Hear hear! As a reasonably long term subscriber I've got to say that I'd much much much rather see you devote your time to keeping LWN afloat & assuring its future than creating Yet Another CMS, it's not like we're short of choice already. The whole open source thing doesn't mean that anything you write has to automatically be open sourced, it merely says that if you distribute something it should be open source.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||