| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Widely ported, sure.Widely ported, sure.Posted Dec 31, 2005 9:52 UTC (Sat) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)In reply to: Widely ported, sure. by ncm Parent article: NetBSD 3.0
Actually, topology-sorted init has been in SuSE since around 8.0, I believe. It is supposed to be part of the LSB since 1.3 but has remained widely unimplemented on other distroes (except, maybe, Gentoo).
(Log in to post comments)
Widely ported, sure. Posted Dec 31, 2005 11:53 UTC (Sat) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] Gentoo does have topology-sorted init. I like it. But this kinda shows what's wrong with "*BSD vs Linux" comparision. Once you are comparing "*BSD kernel" and "Linux kernel" - comparision is more-or-less fair. But when you are trying to compare "*BSD" and "GNU/Linux" (and use just "Linux" to confuse everyone) - it becomes complicated. For every obscure feature found in *BSD you can find equally obscure GNU/Linux distribution where feature was "implemented for ages"! Not exactly fair comparision...
|
|
||||||||||||