LWN.net Logo

autoconf is OK, dunno about the rest

autoconf is OK, dunno about the rest

Posted Dec 25, 2005 7:01 UTC (Sun) by evgeny (guest, #774)
In reply to: autoconf is OK, dunno about the rest by kleptog
Parent article: More information on the X11R7.0/X11R6.9 release

> Just because you use autoconf, doesn't mean the Makefiles are automatically generated.

Agreed here absolutely. In all my projects, I generate only two files with autoconf - a config.h and a Make.conf, which are #included into all other source files and makefiles, respectively. This also greatly helps in portabilty to other platforms lacking autoconf support: as a rule, these are pretty API/ABI-stable, so a replacement for "configure" is trivially written in the native script language which basically fills in a predefined template modulus a few options the user might want to alter (equivalents of --with-options etc).

Having said that, there is, undeniably, quite a way ahead of autoconf for many possible improvements.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds