| |||||||||||||
Ingo's contributionsIngo's contributionsPosted Dec 22, 2005 14:13 UTC (Thu) by brugolsky (subscriber, #28)In reply to: Semaphores and mutexes by nix Parent article: Semaphores and mutexes When one looks back on Ingo's contributions to kernel performance/functionality, the mind boggles. He's the Richard Feynman of kernel hacking -- he hardly reads the literature, he just thinks and codes clearly, and he even has a bit of the showman in him.
(Log in to post comments)
Ingo's contributions Posted Dec 23, 2005 0:58 UTC (Fri) by pimlott (guest, #1535) [Link] he hardly reads the literature Don't forget that Linux became only possible because 20 years of OS research was carefully studied, analyzed, discussed and thrown away.Ingo Molnar
|
|||||||||||||