| |||||||||||||
Semaphores and mutexesSemaphores and mutexesPosted Dec 22, 2005 12:09 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)Parent article: Semaphores and mutexes
That initial post of mingo's ranks up there with his initial O(1) scheduler patch as a classic of patch posting. It does *everything* right (at least on a diplomatic level; this being mingo we can pretty much assume a good design as well). It puts virtally every piece of corporate presentation puffing some new thing or other to shame.
(Log in to post comments)
Ingo's contributions Posted Dec 22, 2005 14:13 UTC (Thu) by brugolsky (subscriber, #28) [Link] When one looks back on Ingo's contributions to kernel performance/functionality, the mind boggles. He's the Richard Feynman of kernel hacking -- he hardly reads the literature, he just thinks and codes clearly, and he even has a bit of the showman in him.
Ingo's contributions Posted Dec 23, 2005 0:58 UTC (Fri) by pimlott (guest, #1535) [Link] he hardly reads the literature Don't forget that Linux became only possible because 20 years of OS research was carefully studied, analyzed, discussed and thrown away.Ingo Molnar
|
|||||||||||||