| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
PPD filesPPD filesPosted Dec 17, 2005 22:21 UTC (Sat) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998)In reply to: PPD files by GreyWizard Parent article: GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition
Not a subset of printers, their printer. Assuming the command line is not off limits, the blind can access email, the web, and most of the innumerable things a computer can offer without GNOME's assistence.
(Log in to post comments)
PPD files Posted Dec 19, 2005 1:09 UTC (Mon) by GreyWizard (subscriber, #1026) [Link] By that reasoning, there could be no qualitative difference between Gnome and Bash because both offer enough features for some users but lack features others require. But common sense recognizes that they are not directly comparable. That's why alternative implementations of accessibility features are irrelevant. A Gnome that didn't have such features would have to be abandoned entirely by disabled users while a Gnome without PPD configuration could be used for everything except that relatively narrow task. This difference in the quality of the user experience is the issue.
|
|
||||||||||||