LWN.net Logo

HW/SW Linux certification

HW/SW Linux certification

Posted Dec 16, 2005 2:38 UTC (Fri) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385)
In reply to: HW/SW Linux certification by bkw1a
Parent article: "Just works with Linux"

I seem to keep running into the opposite problem: Someone asks me to install a Linux binary they found somewhere (in some cases after they paid six figures for it), and I hear that the thing supposedly only runs properly on six-year-old versions of Red Hat. Often the word "run" is generous, and in a number of cases I have forced vendors to admit that their software limps like a wounded waterfowl at best on any Linux version, but there is no hope at all of this software working on a modern Linux distro.

A quick phone call to the vendor followed by some not-so-quick escalation up the support ladder and I end up talking to some engineer who is working on porting the application to a three-year-old version of Red Hat. It should be ready for general release next quarter.

Fast forward a year, and the sales weasel comes to install their "new" software on the now-four-year-old version of Red Hat. I thoughtfully dig through my CD-R archive and provide a machine with exactly the specific old Red Hat version requested. I even provide a second machine with all the official updates to that Red Hat version applied. Both are running a vanilla configuration unless the weasel specified otherwise. Neither works out of the box with the weasel's software, although they fail in different ways.

These days I'm sick of playing the "supported platform" game. I just tell the weasel what we have on our desktops ("here's the install CD guys, have fun"), and that we'll pay only for whatever parts of their software work after they are installed.


(Log in to post comments)

HW/SW Linux certification

Posted Dec 16, 2005 14:42 UTC (Fri) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link]

It's the same in Windows world. I know one case where vendor two years ago (that's 2003, folks!) finally started to support... what ? Windows 2003 ? Windows XP ? Windows 2000 ? No! Windows NT 4.0SP6a!!! Yup - till that time they only supported "Windows NT 4.0SP5"! Situation is quite similar to Linux versions, right ?

HW/SW Linux certification

Posted Dec 16, 2005 23:08 UTC (Fri) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link]

I know of one vendor who is *at this moment* in the process of porting their application from Windows 3.1 (with 16-bit DLLs and everything) to Windows 2000.

On the other hand, at this moment the old Windows 3.1 binaries do work on Windows 2000 if you install all the relevant backward DLLs...I wish the major Linux distributions made it easier to do that.

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.