GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 13, 2005 23:46 UTC (Tue) by dhess (subscriber, #7827)
In reply to: GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition by smitty_one_each
Parent article: GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

I think the best defense of Qt is that its roots predate the C++98 standard. Nevertheless, it's still non-standard, and loses appeal thereby.

Right, like I said, it made sense before reasonable STL implementations were available, but now it's just a pain.

I was hoping that Qt 4 would deprecate some of the redundant classes, but that doesn't appear to be the case.

---

(Log in to post comments)