LWN.net Logo

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 13, 2005 20:48 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition by justi9
Parent article: GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Because of course it should be made `very difficult' for inexperienced users to configure the system to work as they would like. They should adapt to the system, not vice versa, dammit!

(Is that really what you're saying?)


(Log in to post comments)

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 13, 2005 22:32 UTC (Tue) by justi9 (guest, #7522) [Link]

Inexperienced users do not say "I wish I could configure things more". That's just not one of their top concerns. Most inexperienced users don't use much of the configuration that GNOME offers.

So, no, I don't agree with you that inexperienced users want (demand!) the functionality offered in gTweakUI or Devil's Pie. They don't, because they don't care.

You, however, do care a lot, it seems. *And* you're smart and can install gTweakUI or something similar with ease. So go to it.

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 13, 2005 22:57 UTC (Tue) by allesfresser (guest, #216) [Link]

If one is trying to make a corporate environment uniform so that desktop support costs don't bankrupt the company, then making it 'very difficult' for inexperienced users to change things is an absolute requirement. ('Impossible' would be even better.)

I wished many times that we had been able to do this when I was a desktop support tech.

This is not the only target market for a GUI environment, of course. But it is an important one, and one that would generate a significant part of any revenue that companies would pay for a free-software desktop. So I understand completely why it would be a high priority for Gnome developers that are working for Novell via Ximian. Making all the options available to individuals would be a nice thing too. But the simple case probably has to come first... and, also, I would assume that in such a situation the printers and such would be administrated remotely by an sysadmin, rather than adjusting things on each individual desktop. But as always, I could be wrong...

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 14, 2005 5:14 UTC (Wed) by zlynx (subscriber, #2285) [Link]

Yeah. Can you imagine doing phone support for someone running with a window manager they downloaded, with a theme from somewhere else, with changed mouse button bindings?

You'd better have a remote desktop program or some way to reset them to a default GUI.

GNOME v. KDE, December 2005 edition

Posted Dec 14, 2005 10:51 UTC (Wed) by cventers (subscriber, #31465) [Link]

Then perhaps you'd be interested in KDE's advanced Kiosk controls, which
have been a major selling point for the project overseas?

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds