LWN.net Logo

Pure speculation on why

Pure speculation on why

Posted Dec 8, 2005 5:41 UTC (Thu) by felixfix (subscriber, #242)
Parent article: FOSS.IN: A report

I wonder if this is just another stage in a country moving from agriculture and lots of (relative) poverty thru the deveopment stage into a "developed" country. The current developed countries went thru a primitive initial industrial stage where creativity by workers was useless and discouraged. All that was needed was moving the farmer mindset to the factories. But as education spread and industry moved past the assembly line stage, more and more creativity became useful further and further down the pyramid. We are by no means at a stage where everyone is expected to be creative. There are still lots of code monkeys who need lots of supervision and assembly line jobs which require little thinking. But methinks creativity will continue to percolate thru the system. It goes hand in hand with independence.

I wonder if, in a hundred years, creativity will be taken for granted, and the equivalent of code monkeys and assembly line workers will be looked back on as not quaint, but bizarre and primitive and beyond comprehension, as we might look back on illiteracy today. It sparks my mind, seems almost impossible to speculate on how such a radical difference would change society.

I suppose the Internet is just another part of this, making it easier for more people to be creative in their own ways, to find other opinions, for ideas to spread without needing printing presses or broadcast booths.


(Log in to post comments)

Pure speculation on why

Posted Dec 8, 2005 18:47 UTC (Thu) by hazelsct (subscriber, #3659) [Link]

I agree. Richard Stallman commented on the related situation in China, where GPL violations likely happen routinely, by drawing a parallel to the utter lack of respect for patents which allowed the nascent U.S. textile industry to rip off British designs and grow in the early nineteenth century. His point was something like, "judge not lest ye be judged". (Can't find the link, sorry.)

India is not being shown to violate copyrights here, but the lack of respect for established free software practices probably grows from a similar root. Early in the development cycle, it is hard to see the value of respecting copyrights and patents -- or in this case, social norms.

Thanks for the post.

Pure speculation on why

Posted Dec 9, 2005 16:16 UTC (Fri) by gravious (subscriber, #7662) [Link]

My dear felixfix,

A thought-provoking comment. I've been studying Marxism and it seems that Marx realised that proletariat revolutions would occur at different times in different countries because they were at different stages of industrial development. I think the same must hold true for nations with differing stages of info-tech development.

I like the fact that you put developed in quotes. One of the most ingrained mental traps we in the "West" :-) have is progress=good, more progross=better, furthest progressed=best.

Maybe we should go so far as to build in a positive discrimation bias into licenses like the GPL to mitigate for regional factors, sort of like DVD regions! This might allow Africa + Others to, er, catch up (for want of a better phrase) without incurring First World penalties? Just a thought.

Kind regards,
Anthony

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.