| |||||||||||||
DCC 3.0 releasedDCC 3.0 releasedPosted Dec 6, 2005 17:10 UTC (Tue) by trutkin (guest, #3919)In reply to: DCC 3.0 released by kragil Parent article: DCC 3.0 released
If there are no users and no traffic on the mailing lists, how is he stealing people's time?
Less emotion would be nice. He started a project, it didn't take off, he hasn't formally called it
(Log in to post comments)
DCC 3.0 released Posted Dec 6, 2005 23:53 UTC (Tue) by kragil (subscriber, #34373) [Link] I am not bitter. I just think it is unwise for the DCC to have lame (dead) ducks like Userlinux in its ranks.Would you vote for a party where you know that "leading" members are incapable and have not produced any result, but still claim things like: "The UserLinux project provides businesses with freely available, high quality Linux operating systems accompanied by certifications, service, and support options designed to encourage productivity and security while reducing overall costs." ( Cut and paste form the dcc website )
DCC 3.0 released Posted Dec 7, 2005 6:10 UTC (Wed) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510) [Link] You sound pretty bitter. Don't be so sure it's dead yet. I might surprise you.Bruce
DCC 3.0 released Posted Dec 7, 2005 13:30 UTC (Wed) by trutkin (guest, #3919) [Link] Including dead projects is bound to happen in the sort of informal, open community we have. It'snot a big deal.
And if Mr. Perens says he's still working on it, who are you to say otherwise?
|
|||||||||||||