Advertisement
Interested in hardware, diags, validation, Linux, C, ARM, Microcode and low level programming and blazing networks?
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML (Groklaw)Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML (Groklaw)Posted Nov 28, 2005 13:29 UTC (Mon) by freemars (subscriber, #4235)In reply to: Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML (Groklaw) by OldRabbit Parent article: Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML (Groklaw)
The Office 2003 format has the extension .xml. Nobody can ever accuse Microsoft of missing a marketing opportunity. If the extension is .xml it must be XML.
(Log in to post comments)
Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML (Groklaw) Posted Nov 29, 2005 13:14 UTC (Tue) by cpm (guest, #3554) [Link] I'm sorry, I really don't mean to behave like a troll,But if history has shown us anything, it would be that Microsoft does whatever it damned well pleases.
If they want to call a .doc a .xml, they can. And no
|
|
||||||||||||