|
It ain't over till the fat lady singsIt ain't over till the fat lady singsPosted Oct 25, 2005 15:44 UTC (Tue) by b7j0c (subscriber, #27559)In reply to: It ain't over till the fat lady sings by khim Parent article: Cold Realities For Novell (BusinessWeek)
>> I'm talking about web-applications of architecture.
such as?
>> *VM makes it possible to process a lot of data locally. Think about
??? people use flash because it is a shortcut to dynamic content, and frankly its designer tools are better. the adoption of flash has nothing to do with its treatment of network traffic - it operates the same way the browser does with respect to data. it has a local cache, a scripting layer, and a network socket available.
>> Hmm... And what this argument does here on LWN ? Either Linux does not
the web platform has already taken off and no it doesn't matter what OS you use as long as it is fairly stable, supports a decent browser, and has network support. this works out in *favor* of linux, since linux now favorably competes on basis of price, given equal feature support. in your VM/api world, linux cannot compete because microsoft and sun will never release 100% free (osi-compliant, "free as in speech") versions of their VMs and apis. so i think your point is self-defeating, unless you are willing to accept non-free software. in the webapp world, you don't have to.
>> Sorry, but this reminds me of old TCP/IP vs IPX dispute.
how and why are webapps tied to a single network implementation? the 500 million people using the web aren't going anywhere. they will be using the web in a decade and two decades in some form (an open network with markup based communications).
(Log in to post comments)
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.