Frankly I Don't See Either Side As the Future...
Posted Oct 24, 2005 4:55 UTC (Mon) by
dvdeug (subscriber, #10998)
In reply to:
Frankly I Don't See Either Side As the Future... by emkey
Parent article:
Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet)
In what sense are we heading towards huge CPU counts? Intel had a system with 1024 286s out when 286s were the going thing. At a smaller level, my old university replaced a 24 CPU Dynamix machine with a 2 CPU Sun machine some time ago.
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but what BlueGene does is esoteric, and I don't see any indications that the world is going to systems where a large number of CPUs have to be kept in tight lock-step. I don't see that most problems are best solved by such low-level parallelism; a lot of parallel problems have a certain minimal chunk that can takes hundreds, thousands or even millions or billions of clock cycles.
(
Log in to post comments)