| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet)Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet)Posted Oct 20, 2005 17:55 UTC (Thu) by einstein (subscriber, #2052)In reply to: Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet) by clugstj Parent article: Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet)
LOL, cluster-fsck is more like it!
(Log in to post comments)
Windows doesn't have fsck Posted Oct 20, 2005 19:49 UTC (Thu) by dark (subscriber, #8483) [Link] It would be a cluster-chkdsk.
Get with the times! Posted Oct 21, 2005 4:57 UTC (Fri) by leonbrooks (guest, #1494) [Link] That's a cluster-scandisk these days.
Get with the times! Posted Oct 21, 2005 7:27 UTC (Fri) by rqosa (guest, #24136) [Link] Actually it's chkdsk. Unless I'm mistaken, Windows NT and its successors have always used chkdsk, whereas scandisk first showed up in MSDOS 6 (or maybe 5), and hasn't been used since Windows Millenium Edition (the last non-NT Windows).
Get with the times! Posted Oct 21, 2005 13:37 UTC (Fri) by arcticwolf (guest, #8341) [Link] scandisk was first available in MS-DOS 6.2, IIRC.
Get with the times! Posted Oct 22, 2005 18:45 UTC (Sat) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link] That would be a cluster-scandskw
|
|||||||||||