Ballmer: Microsoft to go after Linux strongholds (ZDNet)
Posted Oct 20, 2005 17:55 UTC (Thu) by einstein (subscriber, #2052)
[Link]
LOL, cluster-fsck is more like it!
Windows doesn't have fsck
Posted Oct 20, 2005 19:49 UTC (Thu) by dark (✭ supporter ✭, #8483)
[Link]
It would be a cluster-chkdsk.
Get with the times!
Posted Oct 21, 2005 4:57 UTC (Fri) by leonbrooks (guest, #1494)
[Link]
That's a cluster-scandisk these days.
Get with the times!
Posted Oct 21, 2005 7:27 UTC (Fri) by rqosa (guest, #24136)
[Link]
Actually
it's chkdsk. Unless I'm mistaken, Windows NT and its successors have
always used
chkdsk, whereas scandisk first showed up in MSDOS 6 (or maybe 5), and
hasn't been used since Windows Millenium Edition (the last non-NT
Windows).
Get with the times!
Posted Oct 21, 2005 13:37 UTC (Fri) by arcticwolf (guest, #8341)
[Link]
scandisk was first available in MS-DOS 6.2, IIRC.
Get with the times!
Posted Oct 22, 2005 18:45 UTC (Sat) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)
[Link]
That would be a cluster-scandskw
Get with the times!
Posted Nov 12, 2010 19:06 UTC (Fri) by naesten (guest, #71199)
[Link]
Not unless it's user-initiated, after Windows 95 has already booted!
But the question remains: who in their right minds would have a cluster running Windows 95 in the first place?
(Okay, okay, so maybe you could use ME instead ... but is that even an improvement?)