| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Mercurial loses a developerMercurial loses a developerPosted Oct 2, 2005 20:08 UTC (Sun) by gowen (guest, #23914)In reply to: Mercurial loses a developer by cventers Parent article: Mercurial loses a developer
It won't make the slightest difference. Larry's not just immune to public approbium, it just makes him more convinced he's right. He'll just end up telling you that SCM is simply too hard for mere humans to understand, and that he's preventing O'Sullivan from working on a BK alternative for the sake of Bryan's own sanity.
(Log in to post comments)
Mercurial loses a developer Posted Oct 3, 2005 8:56 UTC (Mon) by peschmae (guest, #32292) [Link] That would be equal to admitting that he is insane - which he sure won't do.
Mercurial loses a developer Posted Oct 3, 2005 18:59 UTC (Mon) by gowen (guest, #23914) [Link] Oh no. It's only non-BM employees who aren't bright enough to solve the difficult problem of SCM.
|
|
||||||||||||