| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Mercurial loses a developerMercurial loses a developerPosted Oct 1, 2005 7:14 UTC (Sat) by huaz (guest, #10168)In reply to: Mercurial loses a developer by nurhussein Parent article: Mercurial loses a developer
Yeah, my impression is also as long as you pay for the commercial license, you are not bound by the clause.
Otherwise, Larry would be an asshole and the company would be an idiot.
(Log in to post comments)
Mercurial loses a developer Posted Oct 1, 2005 7:49 UTC (Sat) by piman (subscriber, #8957) [Link] Well, you're not bound by it, apparently you're just 'politely' asked to stop...
The free version no longer exists Posted Oct 2, 2005 3:52 UTC (Sun) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330) [Link] ... so it appears BitMover is now harrassing buyers of the commercial version.
|
|
||||||||||||