Mercurial loses a developer
Posted Oct 1, 2005 0:34 UTC (Sat) by arcticwolf
Parent article: Mercurial loses a developer
What, a supplier tells a *customer* what they can and cannot do? Isn't it usually the other way around?
Not that this kind of behaviour is a surprise considering who it's coming from, of course, but I *am* surprised that Bryan gave in to it.
It's probably a good thing that despite Matt Mackall's lobbying for Mercurial on lkml, kernel development has continued with git.
to post comments)