Peru Passes Free Software Law - That's Free as in Free Speech (Groklaw) [LWN.net]

Peru Passes Free Software Law - That's Free as in Free Speech (Groklaw)

Posted Sep 28, 2005 11:58 UTC (Wed) by RobSeace (subscriber, #4435)
In reply to: Peru Passes Free Software Law - That's Free as in Free Speech (Groklaw) by toufeeq_hussain
Parent article: Peru Passes Free Software Law - That's Free as in Free Speech (Groklaw)

What is a "proprietary" USE?? The problem with proprietary software isn't
how it is USED, but how it is restricted from being distributed (especially
its source code)... The GPL, for example, places no restrictions on USE;
so whatever you mean by "used for proprietary purposes" would be allowed
equally under the GPL as under BSD or anything else (short of an EULA type
thing, which adds use restrictions)... Unless you didn't really mean "used"
but rather "distributed as closed-source proprietary software", in which
case you shouldn't be studying the "use" portion of the language, but rather
the "distribute" portion...

(Log in to post comments)

Proprietary uses

Posted Sep 28, 2005 13:40 UTC (Wed) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054) [Link]

What is a "proprietary" USE?? The problem with proprietary software isn't how it is USED [....]

How about those licenses which prevent you from using the software to compare its performance with other benchmarks (at least in public)? Obviously, any application for which this restriction is feasible has many other strikes against it, but...

Proprietary uses

Posted Sep 28, 2005 13:47 UTC (Wed) by RobSeace (subscriber, #4435) [Link]

Um, yes, but what has that got to do with my post or the one I was replying
to?? I agree such EULA terms are stupid and evil... But, that's really
got nothing to do with what's being discussed... The parent post tried to
claim that the wording that said free software must be usable for any use
was bad because it meant it could be "used for proprietary purposes",
whatever THAT means... And, I was just pointing out that USING the software
can't really be "proprietary"; it's DISTRIBUTING it that matters...