RMS: The GNU GPL Is Here to Stay (O'ReillyNet)
Posted Sep 24, 2005 16:57 UTC (Sat) by
zblaxell (subscriber, #26385)
In reply to:
RMS: The GNU GPL Is Here to Stay (O'ReillyNet) by jstAusr
Parent article:
RMS: The GNU GPL Is Here to Stay (O'ReillyNet)
The freedom does have to stop somewhere. That guy who wants to modify the DNS server on my machine by sending it patches inside a buffer overrun exploit packet should *not* get the four freedoms. If I believed the DNS server's license required me to grant the freedoms in this particular case, I'd run a different DNS server.
It's not at all clear to me how the GPL maps onto situations where pieces of code are executing in different administrative domains. On the one hand, I should have freedom to use any software I can legally get my hands on in any way that I like, within reason. On the other hand, I should also have rights to privacy and the disposition of my property (software is infinitely reproducible, but server resources are not). When part of the software is running on my machine and part is running on yours, where does my freedom end and your privacy begin?
(
Log in to post comments)