Another look at response times
Posted Sep 23, 2005 14:22 UTC (Fri) by Duncan
In reply to: Another look at response times
Parent article: Another look at response times
Yes, it is "days", but IDR from the original article exactly how they are
measured. Of course, the original article is linked, but one shouldn't
have to look to it to find the missing info.
I agree with you, the table should be labeled. LWN usually does a pretty
good job at that sort of thing, but, perhaps due to the followup nature of
this article, usual thorough proofing may not have been applied.
I've seen Corbet respond in similar instances that while such comments are
appreciated, they'll often get faster action if mailed. IIRC, the address
suggested to mail them to is the general lwn at lwn dot net address, as
listed under the contact faq. The faq mentions that "somebody is always
watching" that address in any case, so it'd be the best for correction
type notes, I'd guess.
I'll mail a request for a label to it as soon as I post this.
to post comments)