| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The return of Citizens Against Government WasteThe return of Citizens Against Government WastePosted Sep 22, 2005 4:06 UTC (Thu) by jtc (subscriber, #6246)In reply to: The return of Citizens Against Government Waste by rev Parent article: The return of Citizens Against Government Waste
"...
Here we have a reiteration of the usual FUD: non exclusive Microsoft solutions are bad.
This is definite proof that 'Citizens Against Government Waste' is just a propaganda machine."
No - that's not it, and I'm surprised no one has noticed this. All the confusion people are experiencing trying to understand their complaint is due to a simple, small error. Obviously, these poor people have been so busy working to support their noble cause that they haven't noticed, or haven't had the time to correct, the error - just one word - a little preposition: When naming themselves, in their haste to get to the real work, they accidentally used the word "against" when they meant to use the word "for". Just make this substitution in their name and it will become clear that their complaint is justified.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||