LWN.net Logo

Advertisement

Front, Kernel, Security, Distributions, Development. See your byline here on LWN.net.

Advertise here

How much?

How much?

Posted Sep 22, 2005 3:02 UTC (Thu) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)
Parent article: The return of Citizens Against Government Waste

It would be interesting to know how much would it cost MS to actually implement OpenDocument format within Office. Let's say 100 programmers need to work on this project for 1 year and each gets paid US$250,000 per year. That's US$25M. Surely, a hundred highly paid MS programmers could pull this off in one year... And a company with US$50G+ in the bank and 80%+ margins on Office can afford such an expense. You reckon?

And given that Office is the best office suite by far, this would then mean that MS gets to keep Massachusetts account and potentially other similar renegades. But maybe they think it's not worth the effort?


(Log in to post comments)

How much?

Posted Sep 22, 2005 11:23 UTC (Thu) by beoba (guest, #16942) [Link]

Now what would be the fun in that?

How much?

Posted Sep 22, 2005 19:33 UTC (Thu) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link]

MS thinks that if they take a stand and make the transition to OpenDocument as painful as possible, MA will give in, nobody will follow MA's path, and OpenDocument will go back into the "obscure freeware (sic) that nobody important ever uses" corner. MS can easily survive without the licensing revenue from MA, and they probably will pay that price even if it is more expensive than the technical modifications to Office to support OpenDocument. Why?

If MA succeeds we will probably see more governments and maybe some large corporations coming up with similar policies; however, if MA fails, we won't hear anything like this for a few more years, long enough for MS to shore up their customer lock-in.

If the population of MS-free users ever gets large enough to get through a year using only OpenDocument for their office applications, MS's circular sales pitch--"you have to use MS because everyone has to use MS"--falls apart. MS office software is too expensive for low-end general consumer use and insufficient for high-end specialized uses.

In a free market with actual, existent competitors, MS could be decimated by a single healthy competitor (although 10% of $50G is still a lot of money); however, the damage to MS's intangible assets (things like stock analyst opinions, trademark value, and consumer opinion) could do more damage to MS than a competitor ever could. When you're a monopoly, the only place to go is down, especially if your users already regard your product as more of a necessary evil than a useful tool that enriches their working lives.

Therefore, we can expect Microsoft fight this until they either crush OpenDocument, or become irrelevant. MS will fight both actively (through political manipulation and tying attractive new products to new versions of their existing ones), and passively (they'll refuse to implement any feature or fix any bug that helps a user use anything other than MS).

How much?

Posted Sep 24, 2005 23:27 UTC (Sat) by rjw (guest, #10415) [Link]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimate

It means reduce by one tenth, not to one tenth.

I think we want multiple competitors to ...erm...10/9-inate them.

How much?

Posted Sep 25, 2005 1:01 UTC (Sun) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link]

Correction noted.

I guess that means we need 9 competitors to emerge at the same time, to make the math right. :-)

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds