Conservative Automatic Stack Size Check
Posted Sep 9, 2005 9:29 UTC (Fri) by pkolloch
In reply to: Conservative Automatic Stack Size Check
Parent article: 4K stacks for everyone?
hmmm, you are right, I knew I had been naive, but I couldn't see what I missed.
Since from what I saw about the VFS, it's a shame that it is not expressed in an object oriented fashion. That could at least limit the amount of candidates. Maybe one could provide some annotations?
But I can well imagine that especially concepts as unionfs which wrap other file systems could in principle be wrapped around each other infinitely. You would have too make up some clever notation to tell the stack analyzer that this really isn't possible. (If there is even such a check ;) ) Or is it done in some clever fashion that the wrapped and the wrapper are not called in a nested fashion, but in some kind of chaining way for exactly the purpose of saving stack space?
[Disclaimer: Again, I have no real clue about the kernel source, so I hope my assumptions are not totally off the beat.]
to post comments)