|| ||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-osdl.org>|
|| ||David Teigland <teigland-AT-redhat.com>|
|| ||Re: GFS, what's remaining|
|| ||Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:59:39 -0700|
|| ||linux-fsdevel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-cluster-AT-redhat.com,
David Teigland <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
> since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm?
Dumb question: why?
Maybe I was asleep, but I don't recall seeing much discussion or exposition
- Why the kernel needs two clustered fileystems
- Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot
possibly gain (or vice versa)
- Relative merits of the two offerings
Maybe this has all been thrashed out and agreed to. If so, please remind me.
to post comments)