GFS, what's remaining
[Posted September 7, 2005 by corbet]
| From: |
| David Teigland <teigland-AT-redhat.com> |
| To: |
| linux-fsdevel-AT-vger.kernel.org, akpm-AT-osdl.org |
| Subject: |
| GFS, what's remaining |
| Date: |
| Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:46:20 +0800 |
| Cc: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-cluster-AT-redhat.com |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm? there's not
much in the way of pending changes.
http://redhat.com/~teigland/gfs2/20050901/gfs2-full.patch
http://redhat.com/~teigland/gfs2/20050901/broken-out/
I'd like to get a list of specific things remaining for merging. I
believe we've responded to everything from earlier reviews, they were very
helpful and more would be excellent. The list begins with one item from
before that's still pending:
- Adapt the vfs so gfs (and other cfs's) don't need to walk vma lists.
[cf. ops_file.c:walk_vm(), gfs works fine as is, but some don't like it.]
...
Thanks
Dave
(
Log in to post comments)