Linux and desktop graphics
Posted Sep 4, 2005 0:31 UTC (Sun) by
njhurst (guest, #6022)
Parent article:
Linux and desktop graphics
"run on graphical adaptors which, in terms of processor performance, far outclass the central processor they serve. "
Is this really true? GPUs are certainly faster at doing certain classes of operations (such as drawing textured polygons), but are they in general superior to CPUs? A simple test would be to implement a CPU emulator on top of a GPU and a GPU emulator on top of a CPU. I suspect that for general purpose computing a CPU is a better compromise.
Not that this is really relevant to the thrust of the argument :)
(
Log in to post comments)