| |||||||||||||
Won't make further contributions to this online debate nowWon't make further contributions to this online debate nowPosted Aug 27, 2005 3:32 UTC (Sat) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998)In reply to: Won't make further contributions to this online debate now by FlorianMueller Parent article: On the defense of piracy enablers
"Negating author's rights that politicians (and judges) consider to be beyond reasonable doubt" is begging the argument. The author has no rights in the US once he's signed away his copyright. Moreover, the Blizzard case is far from something that politicians and judges consider to be beyond reasonable doubt; it was unprecedented and debatable, and I suspect many judges and politicians would agree with bnetd's side.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||