| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Interoperability for games is fundamentally flawed reasoning
Interoperability for games is fundamentally flawed reasoning
Posted Aug 25, 2005 7:47 UTC (Thu) by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048)In reply to: Interoperability for games is fundamentally flawed reasoning by dvdeug
Parent article: On the defense of piracy enablers
All of the examples that you give relate to "fair use", and fair use is a different story when you do something in the privacy of your home vs. when a server software is made available for public use.I never said that consumers have no rights.
(Log in to post comments)
Interoperability for games is fundamentally flawed reasoning
Posted Aug 25, 2005 8:19 UTC (Thu) by Ross (subscriber, #4065) [Link]
If it is fair use is an interesting question, one which hasn't been discussed much. However your description is too narrow. Fair use can and does encompass public uses of copyrighted works.
For example in reviewing, studying, and commenting on a work, you are permitted to make and distribute quotes from it. If the work is short you can distribute the whole thing. If a work is the subject of public inquiry fair use has been found to go beyond that (things like the memos from electronic voting company). Fair use also applies to software, even wholesale copying, in cases where it is required for interoperability and there is no other way to accomplish the task. This would usually mean that the software wasn't very expressive (otherwise there would probably be alternate ways of obtaining the same result).
Oh, and nice deflection BTW
Posted Aug 25, 2005 8:22 UTC (Thu) by Ross (subscriber, #4065) [Link]
I actually responded without noticing you shifted the discussion back to piracy. But in this case we aren't talking about infringement on any of the rights granted under US copyright law so the topic is really mute with respect to bnetd, though it is an interesting discussion on its own.
Interoperability for games is fundamentally flawed reasoning
Posted Aug 25, 2005 19:48 UTC (Thu) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998) [Link]
I don't see the fundamental difference between selling a DVD player that enables the user to play the DVDs how they want over the interests of the copyright holder, and providing a BNet server that enables the user to play Blizzard games how they want over the interests of the copyright holder.