| |||||||||||||
oops...oops...Posted Aug 25, 2005 4:59 UTC (Thu) by roelofs (guest, #2599)Parent article: Configfs - an introduction A fundamental difference, however, is that a suitably-privileged user-space process can create directories within configfs. Perhaps it just looks like a problem, but I'd be more worried about an inadvertent rm -rf blowing away my devices. Or is unlink() not hooked up via the same kind of callbacks? Greg
(Log in to post comments)
oops... Posted Aug 25, 2005 7:58 UTC (Thu) by Thalience (subscriber, #4217) [Link] Seems to me that destroying runtime device configuration is one of the less-harmful things that an inadvertent "rm -rf" could do to a system. Unlike the contents of /etc or /home, /config would be regenerated after a reboot.
|
|||||||||||||