| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Fedora is poorly documented.Fedora is poorly documented.Posted Aug 20, 2005 12:42 UTC (Sat) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Fedora is poorly documented. by Junior_Samples Parent article: An overview of multilevel security
The current targeted policy in Fedora Core 4 covers 91 deamons many of which has added security to desktop users also.
The release notes provides a list of these
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc4/#sn-overview
Fedora Core 5 is expected to take this even further with added usability. See the section on security at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FC5Future
Updates are not supposed to add dependencies. However the audit-libs is a feature of the new 2.6 kernels which SELinux takes advantage of. The audit messages being too noisy is a bug which has already been reported. A errata would fix that.
Documentation on SELinux is currently very detailed. Some of them related to Fedora are
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc2/
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-apache-fc3/
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manu...
(RHEL docs mostly apply to Fedora too)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||