| |||||||||||||
GNOME and the way forwardGNOME and the way forwardPosted Aug 18, 2005 18:30 UTC (Thu) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)In reply to: GNOME and the way forward by piman Parent article: GNOME and the way forward
Maybe that should tell you something about how much the people doing the actual work hate dealing with the non-GNOME/KDE (meaning obsolete standards, X10, unbounded configuration options, arbitrary requests to shell out to external programs No, it merely saddens me to see that the ubiquity of Microsoft has forced even free-software UI developers to bend over backwards to accomodate Microsoft's stale and irritating UI concepts. You have the same option you've always had: Write your own applications If I had a nickel for every time a Gnome supporter told me that, I'd be quite well off. That's the attitude I despise. Sure, Free Software authors write software to scratch their own itch. But if they ignore feature requests that are easy to implement (heck, if they ignore patches implementing such features), then they're no better than proprietary vendors who ignore customer requests. Free Software is about a social contract, not just about technology, and if Gnome developers display the same arrogance as Microsoft, then what's the point?
(Log in to post comments)
GNOME and the way forward Posted Aug 18, 2005 20:15 UTC (Thu) by piman (subscriber, #8957) [Link] > No, it merely saddens me to see that the ubiquity of Microsoft has forced even free-software UI developers to bend over backwards to accomodate Microsoft's stale and irritating UI concepts.
I hear this but I don't believe it; if it was true, I'd find Windows a lot easier to use after using GNOME for the past few years. It definitely borrows more from OS X than Windows, and more from ICCCM/X history than OS X.
> But if they ignore feature requests that are easy to implement (heck, if they ignore patches implementing such features)
100 easy features makes for a complicated program; no patch is without maintenance costs.
> [They're] no better than proprietary vendors who ignore customer requests.
Any software project -- free software or proprietary -- that routinely ignores significant portions of its user group will fail, or a new project to support that group pops up. That's almost tautological, since if the feature doesn't appear, it wasn't that significant in the first place.
> Free Software is about a social contract
The GPL and BSD license, as well as the FSD, OSD, and DFSG, make no promises or even expectations that the application will do exactly what you want. In fact the disclaimer of warranty explicitly says otherwise.
Put your code where your mouth is. Dozens if not hundreds of people continue to do it every day -- which is why software like Window Maker, AfterStep, FVWM, and XFce survive, and projects like GoneME fail.
GNOME and the way forward Posted Aug 18, 2005 20:30 UTC (Thu) by piman (subscriber, #8957) [Link] No, nevermind my other post, I want to take more issue with this nonsense:
> [It] merely saddens me to see that the ubiquity of Microsoft has forced even free-software UI developers to bend over backwards to accomodate Microsoft's stale and irritating UI concepts.
Do you honestly believe the GTK developers are thinking "Boy, I'd love to implement X, Y, and Z, but because MS doesn't, I guess we can't"? Do they have a secret project with 300 options and a million revolution features they're keeping hidden from you? You're postulating a vast conspiracy by the GNOME developers to kill the Unix way, whatever that might mean to you. That's bullshit.
They write software they want; I write software I want; you can write software you want. When the kind of software we want converges, we can share it. That, and nothing more, is free software.
GNOME and the way forward Posted Aug 19, 2005 2:17 UTC (Fri) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] > Do you honestly believe the GTK developers are thinking "Boy, I'd love to implement X, Y, and Z, but because MS doesn't, I guess we can't"?
No.
I honestly believe the Gnome developers believe they can get Windows users to use Gnome if Gnome becomes sufficiently similar to Windows. How else can you explain abominations like GConf, or the one-and-only UNIX MUA that lacks external editor support?
There's no good reason for a lot of the decisions they've made, other than to davka[*] reject the UNIX way.
[*] This Hebrew word is practically untranslatable, but the essence means to do something simply to be obstinate.
GNOME and the way forward Posted Aug 26, 2005 15:52 UTC (Fri) by mightyduck (guest, #23760) [Link] > Do you honestly believe the GTK developers are thinking "Boy, I'd love> to implement X, Y, and Z, but because MS doesn't, I guess we can't"? Do > they have a secret project with 300 options and a million revolution > features they're keeping hidden from you? You're postulating a vast > conspiracy by the GNOME developers to kill the Unix way, whatever that > might mean to you. That's bullshit. No it's not bullshit. Let's get a little reality check here. Gnome is backed by big corporations like Sun, HP, IBM(?) and they give a sh*t about old UNIX users. They're goal is to pry loose Windows users and convert them to their systems. THAT'S why Gnome is more and more following the WindBlows way of things. The one who pays the musicians determines which music is to be played!
|
|||||||||||||