Use clipboard, not cut buffer [LWN.net]

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 2:54 UTC (Mon) by jdub (subscriber, #27)
In reply to: Use clipboard, not cut buffer by zooko
Parent article: GTK+ 2.8.0 released

Whoa, dude. We are *definitely* not targeting the Windows market. We're primarily targeting the 99.999% of users who are more interested in what they can do with their computer than the intricacies computer itself (ie. not like us). There are plenty of things that GNOME does that are very much *unlike* Windows (look at our dialogue boxes for possibly the most controversial - we have adopted a similar verb-and-muscle driven design much like Mac OS Classic and OS X).

Please don't turn a bad or buggy behaviour into a reason to accuse us of appealing only to Windows users. You've raised some good points regarding default behaviour, and some that are purely preferential. What we'd like to do is make stuff like this Just Work out of the box, no nonsense.

With GNOME 2.12, and the inbuilt clipboard manager, I think we've managed to solve a huge chunk of the ugly behaviour in one fell swoop - no configuration or mucking around required! :-)

(Log in to post comments)

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 3:49 UTC (Mon) by Zarathustra (guest, #26443) [Link]

I don't care who you are targeting with Gnome, because we will both agree that it's not me. I have no problem with that, I don't use Gnome, and I'm happy.

But if GTK is a "cross-platform" toolkit, as others have claimed, then when it runs on a Unix platform, it better behave according to the Unix rules and conventions.

And I say this both as a Unix user that uses applications that happen to use GTK, and as a developer that considers GTK an option for writing cross platform applications.

The GTK developers seem to think that Unix == Gnome, and honestly, Al Viro said it best:

judging by the GNOME codebase the people who designed GNOME are culturally incompatible with UNIX.

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 4:01 UTC (Mon) by jdub (subscriber, #27) [Link]

Well, let's get beyond the bile and look at what all of this means: Why do you perceive GTK+/GNOME developers to be anti-UNIX, or somehow incapable of writing software that conforms to your definition of UNIX-like? I'd be keen to find out what else defines UNIX-like to you (beyond the usual "small tools that work together" mantra).

(And for the record, aiming our sights at the 99.999% of users who are not like us makes the software better for us as we go - see the dramatic rise in geek use of Mac OS X for evidence enough of this.)

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 12:37 UTC (Mon) by tgb (guest, #745) [Link]

The problem as I see it is that "legacy" X apps support a certain way of working (ctrl+a, ctrl+e, middle-click-paste etc.). As GTK+ is a cross-platform toolkit, it should support the same keybindings that people on their current platform are used to. X-style cut/paste/keybindings should work under X, in the same way as Ctrl+C should copy text under Windows, in the same way as Command+C does the same under Mac OS.

Any truly-cross-platform toolkit, IMHO, should change to fit in with the way people already work in that specific environment. It should be the toolkit, not the person, changing to fit an environment.

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 18:15 UTC (Mon) by AJWM (subscriber, #15888) [Link]

The GTK developers seem to think that Unix == Gnome, and honestly, Al Viro said it best:

judging by the GNOME codebase the people who designed GNOME are culturally incompatible with UNIX.

That's hardly surprising. Remember, Gnu's Not Unix, and it shows.

Now, I happen to like some of the extra flags and options that the GNU tools (talking command line here) provide over standard Unix, on the other hand they do tend to take it to ridiculous extremes. And I really don't like that they expect me to use an EMACS-like info-browser to find out what some of those flags and options do, rather than putting that information in the man page where it belongs.

But what can you expect? RMS grew up on a DECSystem, not a Unix box. Nothing wrong with that, it's just different.

Use clipboard, not cut buffer

Posted Aug 15, 2005 14:00 UTC (Mon) by Arker (guest, #14205) [Link]

Whoa, dude. We are *definitely* not targeting the Windows market.

Then why did you (in the plural/generic sense, not the personal one) change all the keybindings in the shift from V1.x to V2.x, from a set that pretty much followed normal *nix conventions to a set that follows Windows conventions instead? This, combined with the utter disregard that's been given to people that ask for *at least the option* to go back to the old bindings consistently, certainly seems to give that impression.

And yes, we know about "emacs" key bindings, but as you'll see even just on a quick read through the comments here, there are a lot of problems with that, and people have gotten some very disdainful responses in trying to get those addressed. Besides which, even if this worked properly, it would still be a bit odd to have to change settings on a *nix system to get GTK to behave like a *nix system, don't you think?