| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
GTK+ 2.8.0 releasedGTK+ 2.8.0 releasedPosted Aug 15, 2005 2:32 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)In reply to: GTK+ 2.8.0 released by bojan Parent article: GTK+ 2.8.0 released GTK folks made up their mind as to what the default behaviour should be and they moved on. It is very hard to please everyone and have an endless number of choices available. No. The GTK/GNOME people are too lazy and arrogant to care about giving people choices. They also show complete disdain, if not contempt, for UNIX tradition. Miguel De Icaza goes around saying that "UNIX sucks" at pretty much all of his talks. I've had a bug open against Evolution for 4+ years now complaining about not being able to use an external editor to compose mail. The responses varied from "Nobody needs that" to "it's too much work" to "if you really want it, write it yourself!" Nobody bought the argument that code reuse (via invoking an external editor) is a long-standing UNIX tradition that has served us well for decades. (Needless to say, I don't use Evolution. I use Thunderbird with the external editor extension. At least the Thunderbird authors found a way to give people "endless choices" with their system of plugins and extensions.)
(Log in to post comments)
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 2:57 UTC (Mon) by beoba (guest, #16942) [Link] They also show complete disdain, if not contempt, for UNIX tradition.Tradition for tradition's sake doesn't tend to work.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 3:30 UTC (Mon) by Zarathustra (guest, #26443) [Link] Breaking tradition because you can't be bothered to learn and understand it works so much better!
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 5:42 UTC (Mon) by shahms (subscriber, #8877) [Link] Your perception of what defines "Unix behavior" is skewed. You say you don't want to use the Emacs keybindings and then proceedd to say that the GNOME Emacs key bindings are the "standard Unix rules" and that GNOME should follow them. First of all, there is no such thing as "standard Unix keybindings" for these things. Beyond C-c, C-d and 3 to 4 others related to signals and process control *at a terminal*, Unix applications have used entirely different key combinations for these actions. I personally prefer using 'dd' as the keybinding to delete all text on a line, less stress on my pinky. And if you want to tell me that's not the "Unix standard", I'll tell you to take you Emacs using pansy ass back where you came from because vi is and always has been the standard Unix text editor. And I'd be just as wrong as you have been throughout this entire thread.
Standard text editor Posted Aug 15, 2005 14:27 UTC (Mon) by Arker (guest, #14205) [Link] vi is and always has been the standard Unix text editor. Umm no, you must be confused, that would be Ed.
Standard text editor Posted Aug 16, 2005 1:52 UTC (Tue) by Los__D (subscriber, #15263) [Link] That last sentence was very hard to read, eh?
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 3:57 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Tradition for tradition's sake doesn't tend to work.Breaking traditions because you think you know better is almost always a bad idea, too. "Those who do not understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it -- badly"
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 5:11 UTC (Mon) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] You guys are very funny people.
Gnome and friends pick a default that will provide a usefull and expected functionality to the majority of the people.
A default, by the way, which _your_free_to_change_ any time you feel like it. (you didn't know that? What? are you to lazy to learn anything new?)
"Breaking Tradition" my ass. There is NO traditional Unix keybindings, its a fantasy that only exists in your mind.
Should I go around bitching that Evolution doesn't make it's end users hit j to cursor down and use yy to copy a line and p to paste it? Those are Vi's keys and vi is going to be the oldest and most traditional Unix application that ever existed and people still use today in a regular basis.
And that part about evolution not supporting external editors?
You know why they don't care?
Because nobody that is sane gives a crap, thats why. And the only people that do tend to be the type of people that just complain to give people a hard time and are generally to lazy to do anything about it themselves. (you know you could probably code it yourself)
You know why?
Because *gasp* Evolution already supports whatever freaking editor you could come up with!
How you say ?!
just open up whatever editor you want. Type out whatever message you want using it in any way you feel like.
Now copy your message....
Viola! Now evolution supports whatever editor you feel like.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 7:26 UTC (Mon) by job (subscriber, #670) [Link] It is people like you who turn this into a flame war. Please refrain from posting completely if you have nothing to add but rudeness. This is LWN after all and has been pretty spared from it. I am sure he already knew about the copy-paste-functionality.
In fact, the posters in this thread pointed out some real problems with Gtk, that there are bugs (or accidental features, according to bugzilla) with the Emacs/X-style keybindings. It's there, it should work, but it doesn't. We have also learned about the bigger design problem that applications can bind accelerator keys which are the same as Gtk bound keys. It would be nice if that wasn't possible, Gtk should have precedence and the app should get an error code and not be able to bind it.
Nobody has yet commented on the horrible ineffencies of the toolkits (Gtk and Qt). Look at the paper behind NX, he's got some measurements. I can't see how X will compete with other graphical environments performance wise unless the toolkits gets cleaned up.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 8:14 UTC (Mon) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] sorry. I didn't mean to sound like a troll. But some of what people are complaining about is pretty petty.
And, realy, there are no traditional unix bindings...
But the problem is is that no matter how many people complain about GTK-bound keys not overriding application default keys you will get people complaining that application default key accels should automaticly over write GTK-set ones.
Anyways, I do acknowledge that there are problems with Gnome's theming features and there needs to be considurable polishing going on.
That's something that is a valid complaint for sure.
If you want to change some of the keybinds to suite yourself you have a few options right now.
Open up gconf-edit goto:
Now on many gnome apps like Epiphany you can change keybindings dynamicly to suite yourself.
All you have to do is open up the menu and hover the key over the function you want to change... like "Edit --> Paste" and hit the accelerator you want to replace it with.
Not all applications support this.. I don't think it's very hard to support and I think that many GTK developers are simply unaware of this very nifty little feature. I think it would be a good idea that if the app you like doesn't support it put it in as a feature request.
The other stuff you can do that has a much more far reaching effect is to enable your own key theme.. It's easiest to use the Emacs key theme for reference.
The emacs key theme is located in /usr/share/themes/Emacs
So you can modify that and make your own custom key bindings and stick them in your own home directory like:
or stick them in /usr/share/themes for system-wide access.
Next thing you do is open or create a ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file and make sure you have this line in it:
Then log out and log back in. In addition to that it may be handy to go into a gconf-editor and change gtk_key_themes in /apps/desktop/gnome/interface to whatever you named your theme in.
This, I think, then can have a wider range of effect.. even on non-to-gnome-friendly GTK-using apps like firefox.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 9:40 UTC (Mon) by Zarathustra (guest, #26443) [Link] I did that over a year ago, I fail to see why should I do all that dance for every account/box I have.
I'm running Unix applications on a Unix system, it's so much to ask for a Unix behavior by default?
And no, I already have said I don't use Gnome, and no, most gtk applications are _not_ ported to non-unix systems. And using the proper default keybindings in Unix does _not_ make them less portable either.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 14:26 UTC (Mon) by gravious (guest, #7662) [Link] I'm running Unix applications on a Unix system, it's so much to ask for a Unix behavior by default?For one with such a wise moniker, you seem intent on ignoring a number of posters. It has been pointed out to you, more than once, that there is no standard Unix behaviour. If you have been using Unix for any length of time, you would know this. Indeed, you probably do know it. What you want is _Emacs_ behaviour in all your apps. A small percentage of _all_ computers users know Emacs bindings, therefore for the moment, I fail to see why you shouldn't do that dance for every account/box you have. Having said that, if you tell GTK+ that your key preferences are such and such and then a GTK+ app ignores your choice then it should be flayed to within an inch of its life. Also, if you expect ctrl+u to to erase from the current cursor position rather than the whole line, well, fair enough, raise a bug. There appear to be workable solutions judging by what people have said, you are doing yourself no favours by causing such a stink Very kind regards, i Gravious
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 15:09 UTC (Mon) by Arker (guest, #14205) [Link] well, fair enough, raise a bug. Like he did almost a year ago?
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 15:32 UTC (Mon) by Zarathustra (guest, #26443) [Link] > What you want is _Emacs_ behaviour in all your apps.
Funny, I have not used Emacs in my life, I don't even know any emacs shortcuts, because ^U and ^W, like ^H, are _not_ from Emacs, they are from Unix, and about any Unix application that supports input has implemented them for many decades.
Unix bindings Posted Aug 16, 2005 3:47 UTC (Tue) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link] A quick survey:
Xaw uses ^A, ^B, ^F, ^D, ^V, M-v, ^E, ^N, ^P as Emacs bindings, ^H as delete, and has no use for ^W or ^U at all. Interestingly enough, ^S and ^R activate text search and replace, which has proven quite handy in some Xaw applications like xpostit.
Tk uses the same bindings, except that it doesn't seem to respond to M-v, ^S, or ^R.
Motif uses...none of these AFAICT--not even ^H--they all seem to insert non-printing characters.
Readline (which is *NOT* an X toolkit) uses the above bindings, except ^S and ^R are incremental searches, plus ^W (delete previous word) and ^U (delete to beginning of line).
epic (a TTY-based IRC client) responds to ^A, ^D, ^E, ^F, ^N, and ^P as in Emacs, but ^B and ^W insert special characters. ^U is delete-entire-line, not delete-to-beginning-of-line. How nice that it supports forward-character but not the symmetrical backward-character!
The Linux kernel TTY driver is usually configured to accept ^H or Del as delete, ^W as delete-previous-word (where "word" means something slightly different from Readline), ^U is delete-entire-line, and ^D is EOF. None of the other bindings mentioned so far (^A, etc) do anything other than insert themselves.
Emacs of course *defines* the meanings of ^A, ^B, ^D, ^E, ^F, ^N, ^P, ^V, etc. Emacs also has keys bound to ^W and ^U, but they mean very different things than they do in Bash, a number of other X applications, and Unix TTYs. These bindings are quite possibly older than Unix.
Several popular applications that originated on or were ported to Unix (e.g. Netscape) do support Readline-like key bindings, despite the fact that they were based on toolkits previously mentioned here (e.g. Motif).
GTK-1 applications supported mostly Bash-like key bindings, but without the search functions. In addition, GTK-1 file open/save dialogs supported filename autocompletion with Tab, which is *really* nice. Modern GTK-2 file open/save dialogs support similar completion, but needing more keystrokes. For several months in GNOME's history, the Tab key just selected the next field.
The application I am using now (Galeon) supports almost none of these bindings, even when typing text into a text widget. I'm not sure why the Galeon developers think I might want ^B to open the bookmarks editor window in the middle of this sentence, but it does.
Personally, I really miss the GTK-1 application bindings, but I'm offended by the GTK *transition* more than the actual binding set at any instant in time. GTK-1 had IMHO the best combination of useful editing primitives with default key bindings, which made GTK-1 applications very attractive to me at the time.
I used to use a lot of GNOME applications, back when GNOME 1.4 was current. For reasons I still don't understand, the GTK and/or GNOME people decided to make sweeping, backward-incompatible changes that removed features from user-visible parts of GTK/GNOME programs, and they called this forward progress. It was almost as bad as being forced to use Windows in terms of features that just disappeared one dist-upgrade. Some of those features have returned, but not all, and many are often buried behind something that looks and feels like the Windows registry editor.
Today, I no longer trust GNOME to provide usable tools as I once did. I used to simply choose from one of the several GNOME 1.4-based alternatives (usually directly from the GNOME menu), and didn't really look for other software if my immediate needs were adequately satisfied. Now it's the other way around--I look everywhere *except* GNOME and/or GTK for various applications, and I apply a small but non-zero negative bias to GNOME or GTK-based candidates where competing implementations exist.
My trust in the GNOME organization was completely destroyed by that organization's behavior in the past. For all I know, next week they'll decide that GTK/GNOME 2.x was a bad idea too, and they'll discard it like they did 1.x. It seems to me that I shouldn't waste my time with their potentially-soon-to-be-unsupported software. I don't know how long it will last, and it seems I cannot rely on the rest of the open-source community to take over if the central GNOME organization fails again.
What really baffles me is that the GNOME maintainers and their apologists don't seem to *get* this. It's not about key bindings, it's about alienating your existing users to benefit users you don't have yet. It reminds me of that fable about the dog, a bone, and the dog's reflection in the river...
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 12:27 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Regarding external editor support: Because nobody that is sane gives a crap, thats why. You're wrong. External editor support is one of the most popular bugs in Evolution bugzilla. But the GNOME people have decided they know better and don't need to listen to people who were using computers since before the GNOME developers were born, and might have an idea or two that they've learned over the years. If GNOME were a commercial product, it would sink without a trace, because a commercial entity that showed such disdain for its "customers" would never last (unless it somehow became a monopoly like MSFT.) Now copy your message.... open up evolution, start a new message... now paste your message! That's a totally unacceptable solution, and you know it. Only a complacent, arrogant, know-it-all GNOME hacker would even suggest it. :-)
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 15:02 UTC (Mon) by elanthis (subscriber, #6227) [Link] Hardly. GNOME is among one of the most popular commercialized Open Source/Free Software projects around. Just ask Ximian. Your comparison is fairly pointless, though, because even commercial software projects are in no way dependent on the whim of their users - they are dependent on the whim of their *customers*. Free Software doesn't have customers, not unless you paid some company for a support contract. Did you pay a company for GTK/GNOME support?
The "users" you refer to that are upset with GTK and/or GNOME are infinitely small in number compared to the numbers of the users that GNOME targets and who are quite happy with it. It sucks being in a minority, but that's where you are. It especially sucks being in a minority when you're not in a democracy, but Free Software isn't a democracy; it's a meritocracy, perhaps a dictatorship, possibly an "action-cracy" (what's the correct word for that?) - you don't get what you want because you ask for it, you get what you want by doing it. Maybe somebody will care about your opinion and put forth the effort for you, maybe they won't, but they sure as hell aren't required to do so.
If you don't like something in the FOSS world, then you've got the source, go ahead and fix it. Write an Evolution plugin that invokes an external editor, or hack up GTK to allow you to invoke an external editor on any text entry. Do whatever you want. Why do you think the GTK/GNOME developers are required to satisfy you with features they don't want? You're not that special, your opinion is not superior to their own, your individual work habits are not more important than theirs or mine. They scratched their itch, they wrote software targetting a specific user base, they have zero incentive to target users like you, and nothing in the world makes that wrong, no matter how unfortunately irritating it may be for you.
<on-topic-rant>There is nothing, NOTHING, more irritating about being a FOSS developer than selfish and whiny users who demand that YOU spend the time and effort to fix THEIR problems for FREE all while insulting you and all the work you did and gave to the world for nothing in return. Developers that have given you free/Free software are in no way beholden to you. If you don't like something you got for free, and you can't accept that the developer may not agree with your priorities, that's your own damn problem, get over it.</on-topic-rant>
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 15:24 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Did you pay a company for GTK/GNOME support? No, because I don't use GNOME. I use some programs that use GTK, it is true. If you don't like something in the FOSS world, then you've got the source, go ahead and fix it. Why should I? I'll just switch to a FOSS product (Thunderbird, in this case) that works the way I like, and whose developers are not so touchy. There is nothing, NOTHING, more irritating about being a FOSS developer than selfish and whiny users who demand that YOU spend the time and effort to fix THEIR problems for FREE all while insulting you and all the work you did and gave to the world for nothing in return. If you have a DSL connection under Linux, you are almost certainly using free software I wrote to connect to your DSL provider. I am a FOSS developer, but that doesn't give me the right to ignore customer requests (I consider users of my free stuff customers too.) What bothers me about GNOME is that they are turning against 25+ years of experience. If the UNIX geeks hadn't doggedly persisted to keep Microsoft from owning computing, GNOME would not exist. It could not exist without the UNIX/Linux traditions. I don't use KDE either, but at least the KDE developers manage to make their system user-friendly for newbies without alienating long-time UNIX users. (kmail and knode both have excellent support for external editors.)
The pun compels me... Posted Aug 16, 2005 20:52 UTC (Tue) by zakaelri (guest, #17928) [Link] If you have a DSL connection under Linux, you are almost certainly using free software I wrote to connect to your DSL providerI run apache off of my DSL... and from here it looks like you've just been served. Zam! Just trying to lighten the mood. You all seem to be getting a bit to worked up about all of this ;)
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 7:51 UTC (Tue) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link] The "users" you refer to that are upset with GTK and/or GNOME are infinitely small in number compared toWell, that's all we really need to read right there. It doesn't matter how the sentence ends, we now know We're Not Welcome Here Any More. This is the same line a proprietary software vendor gives when they terminate a popular closed-source product. As soon as those words are uttered, it's time for the users to move to another product. The funny thing is, I was once in the same room as Miguel when he was proselytizing that improving the desktop (particularly in the area of automated, or at least centralized, configuration) should improve it for dead-end users and sophisticated users alike, e.g. if your grandmother can just click two buttons to make her new WiFi card work, then you can too--and you would want to, because it would be quicker than downloading a patch from sourceforge CVS, adding your card's PCI ID to the driver, and rebuilding your kernel, even if you could do it. This enables even sophisticated hackers to be somewhat more efficient consumers of software, so they can be efficient producers of some other software (except maybe WiFi card drivers). It would be nice to get an exact quote of what Miguel said, if someone has it, from his OLS talk. That talk was what inspired me to download and install GNOME for the first time, and at the time, the applications were feature-rich and well designed, and there were a number of labor-saving conveniences even for a Unix hacker. Now it seems that the story has changed: GNOME is for dead-end users only, and applications are rediscovering what features they absolutely need one at a time. I spend a lot of time trying to coerce the few remaining GNOME applications I can actually use to behave properly. My threshold for configuration pain in GNOME is falling rapidly, and with few exceptions I now generally substitute 'dpkg --purge' for 'gconf-editor'. I thought the whole point of GNOME in the first place was to avoid having to edit strange configuration files in every application you used--now it seems I have to edit strange configuration files distributed across all of the applications I use and I have to use a specialized non-text editor to do it. Commented X resources files and vi are roughly equivalent to the current state of GNOME, except that vi is useful for other purposes as well.
If you don't like something in the FOSS world, then you've got the source, go ahead and fix it.Ordinarily this would be the appropriate course of action; however, in the GNOME case, this should not be necessary in the first place, and there are two reasons not to fix GNOME:
<on-topic-rant>There is nothing, NOTHING, more irritating about being a FOSS developer than selfish and whiny users who demand that YOU spend the time and effort to fix THEIR problems for FREE all while insulting you and all the work you did and gave to the world for nothing in return.Crap is still crap, even when it's free crap, and usually nobody wants another person's crap unless that person's name is Piero Manzoni. I gather that the GNOME project:
The good news is that if you behave this way in the FOSS world, eventually everyone who really cares about your project will be driven away, and they'll advise all their selfish and whiny friends to stay away too, so the problem is ultimately self-correcting.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 13:54 UTC (Tue) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] Hrm..
I don't know about you, but I am a long time Linux user also.
I thought that gnome 1.x sucked. I thought early kde sucked too. I avoided it like the plague.
I used enlightenment, then afterstep, then blackbox, then fluxbox...
It wasn't until 2.4 was when I actually got interested in Gnome and GTK in general and wasn't until 2.6 that I was sold on it. Now I am happy.
Early Gnome 2.x versions and especially 1.x versions were next to worthless for me. They caused me more grief then they helped.
As you pointed out there were never any such thing as traditional Unix bindings.. What the posters were pointing out just happenned to be the key bindings that they grew used to for whatever reason while the rest of the world used something else (including in Unix)..
Hell, I am a afraid to know what Sun thought was standard in CDE!
All this hate..
This is like when they made the switch from Explorer-like interface to the 'Spatial' interface for nautilus. Lots of people were freaking out... It doesn't make sense, Gnome still supports the file explorer interface!! you just have to change the configuration slightly, even after 2-3 official releases later, and with improvements too.
It's not like Gnome doesn't make allowances in configurations. They have the 'emacs' style key buttons, they still have given the program authors and end users to customize it to their heart's content.
I think it's more of instead 'gnome authors are corporate now and don't give a shit', I think it's a lot more far and a lot more accurate to say: 'they are human and don't have everything perfect for everybody'.
Newer versions Gnome specificly and GTK in general is a MASSIVE improvement over older releases.
Now I think it's perfectly acceptable to criticize, but to suggest that they are just corporate whores is just bullshit and not fair at all.
I am a happy user and gratefull for this high quality free software. I have nothing against corporations in general, as long as they are good business citizens, and I have no objections to free software authors making a living for their work.
Best thing we can do right now to resolve this is either try to get them to refine the themeing engines in general and for keycombos specificly by submitting bug reports and educating them were they need improvement or if your actually usefull: submitting code and patches to improve functionality.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 14:29 UTC (Tue) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Best thing we can do right now to resolve this is either try to get them to refine the themeing engines in general and for keycombos specificly by submitting bug reports and educating them were they need improvement or if your actually usefull: submitting code and patches to improve functionality. Explain that to the Gnome-vim author. He did submit patches and the Gnome guys ignored him because external editor support doesn't fit into their world vision.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 5:35 UTC (Tue) by zblaxell (subscriber, #26385) [Link] Now copy your message.... open up evolution, start a new message... now paste your message!Anyone know of an X application that will print the contents of the X selection on stdout, and copy stdin to the X selection? This would allow me to work around a huge number of highly broken applications (at least, the ones that can accept multi-megabyte "paste" requests).
dskoll's bug against Evolution. Gnome-vim as an option Posted Aug 15, 2005 18:13 UTC (Mon) by stfn (guest, #30357) [Link] Just for reference (I was curious) that bug seems to be
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220122
and 3 others are marked as duplicates
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216784
Also, and this was mentioned elsethread, there's vim-as-a-Gnome-component now
http://www.opensky.ca/~jdhildeb/software/gnome-vim/
but that's just vim and Gnome (which suits me fine), not $EDITOR and all GTK applications as some would like. I'm a little surprised this hasn't come up earlier (maybe it has) in the context of Gnome IDEs.
dskoll's bug against Evolution. Gnome-vim as an option Posted Aug 15, 2005 20:24 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] Gnome-vim is cool, but I don't use vim, alas. :-( I'm an emacs guy. The Gnome-vim author's comments are interesting, though: Having noticed that it still hasn't been committed to CVS, I've sent two polite reminders to fejj asking if there are any further changes I should make, or whether there is anything else I can do to help. So far I haven't received any response. I guess I'm kind of at a loss for what to do next -- I don't know whether my emails have been spam filtered, whether fejj is ignoring me, or whether he just doesn't consider this patch a high priority. I'll try posting to evolution-patches once more to ask what's up -- hopefully I'll at least get a response. That speaks volumes.
dskoll's bug against Evolution. Gnome-vim as an option Posted Feb 3, 2007 5:24 UTC (Sat) by jpeter1978 (guest, #43118) [Link] I find it odd that when someone provides a good argument for their case that everyone just shuts up. Did this thread just get too long and so by the time this statement was made, very few read it? Or was it perhaps that it put all other arguments to shame? BTW dskoll, I don't think there exists a highlighter bright enough to showcase your point, which I wholehearted agree with. Too bad this post and others like it will get lost among all the flame wars.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 15, 2005 23:14 UTC (Mon) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link] > Nobody bought the argument that code reuse (via invoking an external editor) is a long-standing UNIX tradition that has served us well for decades.
And that is the crux of the matter here. GTK, being primarily a toolkit for Gnome, is not interested in Unix tradition. These people (GTK and Gnome developers) want to build an easy to use desktop system for regular folks, most of which are most likely going to be Windows users converting to Gnome (at least that's who they are targeting with their software). I don't know if this will ever happen, but that's what they appear to be doing.
Obviously, they are upsetting a few people (well, maybe quite a few - time will tell) in the process. At least they have some kind of a plan and they are sticking to it.
We all need to ask ourselves hard questions from time to time and one of them is: "If Unix (whatever that's supposed to mean) is such a great desktop system, why isn't it on everyone's desktop?" I distinctly remember 40 MHz Sparc workstations being delivered to our lab that used to put Windows to shame. Doesn't appear that way any more...
I think Apple will have a few things to say about that (i.e. make it Unix where it works, make it something else where it sucks), KDE people may have their say (not a user, so don't know) and Gnome/GTK folks obviuosly have their own view. I am certainly not going to blame them for trying.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 1:07 UTC (Tue) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] GTK, being primarily a toolkit for Gnome, is not interested in Unix tradition. Thanks for being honest. Now tell me: From all I can see, the KDE hackers have more-or-less the same goals as the GNOME hackers --- an easy-to-use graphical desktop. The KDE hackers, somehow, have managed to support UNIXy things like external editors for years now. Are GNOME hackers incapable of it? I don't believe that for a second, so I can only believe they are willfully turning their backs on UNIX. That's fine up to a point, because I don't have to use GNOME. But when their decisions start contaminating other software (like Firefox) that doesn't have a viable alternative, then I get upset.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 1:22 UTC (Tue) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link] > Thanks for being honest.
You are most welcome.
> I don't believe that for a second, so I can only believe they are willfully turning their backs on UNIX.
Yes, that is surely a valid point of view for a "Unix person". In other words, the glass is half empty. On the other hand, for "Gnome people", the glass may be half full.
> But when their decisions start contaminating other software (like Firefox) that doesn't have a viable alternative, then I get upset.
Well, I don't want to be a smartarse here, but the only real way to address these things is to get involved in the development process of Firefox. I don't have enough knowledge and time to do GUI development, so I had to get over things and eventually got used to "new defaults". I'm sure others will choose differently. And I'm sure you'll make your choices too. At least we all don't have to pay for the darn things, so nobody's robbing us.
However, when proprietary software vendors sell me a licence for a piece of software worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and then can't/won't fix segfaults in it, then I get really upset.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 2:19 UTC (Tue) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link] However, when proprietary software vendors sell me a licence for a piece of software worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and then can't/won't fix segfaults in it, then I get really upset. Well, that's in a whole other league of evil. :-) I wouldn't dream of accusing the GNOME hackers of being that bad. But they are pretty arrogant: The Gnome-vim author has working code that does a pretty useful thing, and the Evolution maintainers are refusing to merge it, simply ignoring his (repeated) requests to put his code in the mainline version. For crying out loud: He did all the work! What more do you want? If you don't like his code, at least give him the courtesy of a response. That's almost (but not quite) as bad as your example.
GTK+ 2.8.0 released Posted Aug 16, 2005 2:33 UTC (Tue) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link] > Evolution
Actually, Evolution 2.2 is so full of bugs that it regularly crashes when used with Exchange connector (e.g. click on "Reply to All" crashed Evo pretty often). With IMAP it crashed occasionaly, but it is still pretty ordinary. So, I'm hoping they are just busy fixing the segfaults and simply didn't have time to do anything else... ;-)
|
|
||||||||||||