|
librarieslibrariesPosted Aug 12, 2005 14:03 UTC (Fri) by ringerc (guest, #3071)In reply to: Our bloat problem by dmantione Parent article: Our bloat problem
Actually, as far as I know a well written lib won't have much non-read-only static data (so it can be shared efficiently), and should incur only a very small memory overhead for any unused portions. If I recall correctly unused parts of the library aren't even read from disk.
There are many things to complain about with shared libraries, but their on-disk size is not one of them unless you're building embedded systems. If you are, you can build a cut down version of most libraries quite easily.
(Log in to post comments)
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.