| |||||||||||||
Kernel testing and regressions: an exampleKernel testing and regressions: an examplePosted Jul 28, 2005 23:11 UTC (Thu) by rlrevell (guest, #23596)Parent article: Kernel testing and regressions: an example
This isn't the best example; the only reason this did not get noticed is that everyone who needs this feature is still using the rejected-from-mainline realtime LSM while waiting for the distros to catch up.
(Log in to post comments)
Kernel testing and regressions: an example Posted Jul 28, 2005 23:54 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] I have to say that's kind of the point: by the time you get it from your distributor, it's a bit late to be testing it. Part of the process of making the kernel (or any other project) better is to test things before they get set into a stable release, and that is especially true for new features.
Kernel testing and regressions: an example Posted Aug 3, 2005 14:51 UTC (Wed) by vlima (subscriber, #4405) [Link] Updated pam and glibc that know about RLIMIT_RTPRIO and RLIMIT_NICE are avaiable in Fedora's rawhide. (And a hacked pam for Fedora Core 4 from Planet CCRMA.)
I still don't get Ingo Molnar's statement that If it was completely non-functional should this work?
$ chrt -r 20 bash
$ ps -eo rtprio,comm | grep bash
- bash
20 bash
|
|||||||||||||