Development process and quality assurance
Posted Jul 20, 2005 8:07 UTC (Wed) by error27
In reply to: Development process and quality assurance
Parent article: Kernel Summit 2005: Development process and quality assurance
Um... I did hit preview but I was too sleepy to read my post apparently.
I was trying to say that I support the idea of bug tracking websites.
Redhat does a better job tracking kernel bugs than bugzilla.kernel.org for two reasons. First Redhat developers actively use their bugzilla. Second they require the bug reports to be more focused in terms of features and kernel versions.
I was also trying to express disapointment with several features in bugzilla. Perhaps if these were fixed more developers would use it.
Also I was going to give a shout out to Adrian Bunk who is a hero and responds to many of the bugzilla reports on bugzilla.kernel.org.
And then I was going to sleep because I can barely keep my head up anymore and certainly can't write coherently.
to post comments)