| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
In defense of epollIn defense of epollPosted Nov 1, 2002 21:53 UTC (Fri) by chad.netzer (✭ supporter ✭, #4257)In reply to: In defense of epoll by Peter Parent article: Linus on what remains to be merged
Thanks. I don't mean to pick on epoll(), other than that it is a current example of a feature that is immediately useful, relatively small and unintrusive to add to the source, but could still be considered 'bloat' (rightly or wrongly), by those who might want the freedom to adopt yet another event delivery mechanism in the future.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||