Just as last week's LWN Weekly Edition was being finalized, the word came
out that the European software patent directive had, after years of strange
maneuvers, lobbying, and politics, been rejected by the European
Parliament. And this was not any ordinary rejection: the final vote was
648 to 14. That is quite an outcome, considering that, not
particularly long ago, a good result in the final parliamentary vote was
seen as a long shot at best.
This vote is not a result of a sudden general understanding that software
patents are a bad idea. In the end, most parties went against the
directive because (1) it had been amended to the point that nobody
liked it anymore, and (2) the parliament was not pleased with how it
had been treated by the European Council. So the vote should not be seen
as a definitive statement from Europe on software patents; it also should
not be seen as the end of the debate.
For now, the software patent situation in Europe remains unchanged. In
theory, such patents are not legal, but the European Patent Office (EPO)
has issued quite a few software patents anyway. Some European member
states are more friendly to software patents than others. So the situation
remains muddled, and is likely to stay that way for a while. Court battles
to determine the legitimacy of EPO-issued software patents seem almost
certain. So software patents are still a threat, at some level, for
European free software developers and users. Even if a software patent
issued by the EPO is eventually thrown out of court, it's still no fun to
be the one in court trying to make that happen.
In other words, this outcome is very much a mixed result. It is far
superior to a directive which would have enshrined software patents in
European Union law; the rejection of that language is an unambiguous
victory. But it would have been far nicer to pass a version of the
directive which clearly disallowed patents on software. It would have been
nicer to put an end to this problem - in Europe, at least.
Because this debate certainly is not over. The European Council once said
that, if the directive were to fail to pass the Parliament, there would be
no further attempts. For those who truly believe that: we have some nice
ocean-front property in Luxembourg we'd be willing to sell you. This sort
of issue, backed as it is by interests with lots of money in the bank and
even more in their eyes, almost never goes away. Software patents in
Europe will be back, at the EU and member state levels.
For now, though, the free software community can celebrate an important
victory. There is still no global software patent regime in place, and
there is a far higher awareness of the issue than there was a few years
ago. All the effort put in by so many people working to fight this
directive has paid off. Great congratulations are due to each and every
person who contributed to this fight, whether that contribution took the
form of massive organizing or a quick letter to a member of parliament.
You have shown that you can influence policy, even on an obscure technical
issue, and even in the face of well-funded opposition. Well done!
Comments (1 posted)
Ever since the launch of
Xandros
Corporation four years ago, the company has settled into a regular
release cycle. New versions of Xandros Desktop OS for home users
("Standard" and "Deluxe" editions) have come out towards the end of each
calendar year, followed by high-end "Business" editions some six months
later. Continuing in this practice, Xandros Desktop OS 3 Business was
unveiled last month when it became available to customers from the
company's online store for $129.
As the name suggests, the "Business" edition is designed as a desktop system
for small and medium-size businesses. This product should appeal to those
production environments that have been evaluating the possibility to move
their desktops to Linux, but have not found a suitable replacement for
their Windows systems - either because many of the popular Linux
distributions lack certain required functionality or because their existing
infrastructure is overly dependent on Microsoft Windows and Office, and
possibly even SQL Server, migration of which would be a costly and tedious
task.
Xandros Business Desktop was specifically designed for the latter group. The
company claims that these businesses can keep their current Windows server
infrastructure, MS Office files, and even run many of the Windows
applications they depend on, but can still migrate their desktop computers
from a virus- and spyware-prone operating system with less than a stellar
security reputation to a more secure and less maintenance-intensive
Linux-based system. Although the initial migration will certainly cost some
capital, Xandros argues, the overall long-term savings should be
considerable.
Xandros is walking a tight rope here. On one hand, businesses that consider
migrating their desktop systems to Linux have likely started experimenting
with Linux already, probably with one of the freely available
distributions, such as Fedora, Mandriva or Ubuntu. If these fit their
requirements, they would almost certainly prefer one of them over a
$129-per-seat Xandros Desktop OS. If they haven't found a suitable
replacement, Xandros might still be a viable option, but it doesn't take a
genius to figure out that a business with a few dozen computers will end
up having to pay license fees that are not much lower than those for
Windows. If this is the case, why bother with a costly migration to Linux?
Probably the best reason is to save on system maintenance. As we know,
keeping Windows boxes free of viruses, spyware, worms and other Internet
malware is a costly and time-consuming exercise, so replacing Windows with
Linux, wherever possible, would certainly eliminate most of this expense.
The next question is: why Xandros? If you have never installed and used this
distribution, you will be forgiven for asking - that's because Xandros
remains our firm favorite as the best and most user-friendly desktop Linux
distribution there is. From the moment you insert the installation CD into
your CD-ROM drive until you finally boot into your new desktop, you will
see true usability features not found in any other distribution. Xandros
has not built an operating system by just integrating its individual pieces
from freely available software on the Internet, it also developed many
utilities that conform to the definitions of software usability better than
most other distributions.
Besides all the well-established features of Xandros Desktop, such as the
Xandros File Manager, Xandros Networks (for downloading and installing
software and security updates), the integrated drag-and-drop CD/DVD-burning
application, enhanced KDE Control Center, CrossOver Office (with support
for MS Office, Adobe Photoshop and other Windows applications), file system
encryption and excellent hardware detection, the Business edition adds
further incentives. Among them, Windows networking features are probably
the biggest selling point of Xandros Business Desktop - especially when
considering its ability to authenticate to both Windows NT and Active
Directory domains, to browse NFS shares, and to perform drag-and-drop
operations on network shares, as well as FTP servers.
This edition of Xandros Desktop OS comes with an extra Application CD, an
excellent 350-page User Guide, and a 9-page Getting Started Guide.
Inserting the CD immediately brings up a software installer dialog,
providing an opportunity to browse through the available packages. Among
the more interesting applications included on the CD are OpenOffice.org
1.1.2 and StarOffice 7 with various dictionaries, together with a number of
development packages and database servers, as well as Citrix and SAP
clients. The manual is identical to the one available with the Deluxe
edition and Xandros deserves praise for making an effort to put together a
really useful guide.
Despite developing a superb package, Xandros might still have hard time
selling the product in desirable quantities. It seems that most of the
migration efforts we get to hear about these days tend to revolve around
one of the free distributions (the current migration to Linux by the
municipalities of Munich and Vienna are good examples), customized to their
needs. Also, we haven't heard of any success stories involving Xandros
Business Desktop, an event that would surely result in a
self-congratulatory press release by the company. As good as Xandros
Desktop is, it still remains a largely proprietary system, not particularly
cheap, and with a potential of another vendor lock-in, which is a trap that
many businesses would rather avoid.
This brings up the next question: is the company's current business strategy
of selling boxed products, as opposed to giving the products away and
charging for services, a sustainable business model? If the history of open
source software companies is anything to go by, selling services tends to
result in sustainable growth, while selling software boxes is likely to
lead towards stagnation at best, and bankruptcy at worse. There are far too
many examples of the latter to ignore the danger!
Comments (9 posted)
Next week is the annual pilgrimage to the
Ottawa Linux Symposium, one
of the key Linux development events worldwide. The
schedule has
been posted for those who are interested; it looks like the usual
collection of great talks. LWN editor Jonathan Corbet will be giving an
updated version of the "2.6 Kernel Roadmap" talk at 10:00
on Wednesday.
The Desktop
Developers' Conference is happening the two days prior to the opening
of OLS. We would love to be able to report from that event, but your
editor will, instead, be downstairs at the annual kernel summit. Look for
our coverage from that event early in the week. There will be reports from
OLS as well, though your editor has learned, from experience, to rest well
before the famous closing party. See you in Ottawa.
Comments (1 posted)
Page editor: Jonathan Corbet
Inside this week's LWN.net Weekly Edition
- Security: The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act; New vulnerabilities in dhcpcd, krb5, leafnode, sharutils, ...
- Kernel: API changes in 2.6.13; PCI error recovery; Manual driver binding; CFQ v3.
- Distributions: Debconf5: Derived Debian Distributions, AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.2.1, Debian security
support system fixed, debian-cd v3.0 plans, Ubuntu Foundation launched,
SPI 2005 Annual Report.
- Development: Edit audio file tags with EasyTAG,
new versions of ZODB, LAT, MediaWiki, liboggz, Dropline GNOME,
Scribus, Kicad, SQL-Ledger, Open Clip Art Library, Coin3D, FreeB,
libannodex, Firefox, G11NToolKit, GCC, PHP.
- Press: The BBC and patents,
Debian-Based Enterprise Linux, Spammers Use E-Mail Authentication,
Microsof's hands-on Linux lab, open-source affects database prices,
command-line animations, Windows vs Linux in EDA.
- Announcements: 64 bit Mathematica, PloneLive 1.0, Pentium-M SBC,
SFLC announces Plone as client, FSFE Newsletter, Linux Gazette,
Bug 300000 sweepstake, GUADEC 2006, linux.conf.au 2006 CFP,
ToorCon, USENIX Security Symposium.
- Letters: ESR on the software patent vote.
Next page:
Security>>