| |||||||||||||
The Grokster rulingThe Grokster rulingPosted Jun 30, 2005 19:32 UTC (Thu) by AJWM (guest, #15888)In reply to: The Grokster ruling by pimlott Parent article: The Grokster ruling
I think that makes sense. There are "substantial non-infringing uses" for hammers, crowbars and jimmies, but somebody skulking around a neighborhood at night with those in one hand and a bag in the other is likely to get nicked for possession of burglary tools.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||