| |||||||||||||
The Grokster rulingThe Grokster rulingPosted Jun 30, 2005 5:30 UTC (Thu) by melevittfl (subscriber, #5409)Parent article: The Grokster ruling
Remember, file sharing software doesn't commit copyight infringement, people commit copyright
But I guess the courts only wants to apply that standard to guns, not songs.
(Log in to post comments)
The Grokster ruling Posted Jul 1, 2005 1:32 UTC (Fri) by njhurst (guest, #6022) [Link] Are guns promoted as 'for killing people'?
The Grokster ruling Posted Jul 2, 2005 14:17 UTC (Sat) by tseaver (subscriber, #1544) [Link] Are guns promoted as "for killing people"? For handguns, certainly: they have no other (primary) purpose except to kill people. Secondary purposed involve the *threat* of killing people, or *practice* for that act. As Lynyrd Skynyrd notes: [They] ain't good for nothin
|
|||||||||||||