Posted Jun 24, 2005 3:13 UTC (Fri) by Feldegast (guest, #30638)
[Link]
[This comment has been removed by the LWN editors, sorry]
Images of the complaint and its exhibits
Posted Aug 12, 2005 16:58 UTC (Fri) by petrofsky (guest, #26862)
[Link]
I'm posting this comment on August 12 as a reply to LWN.net comment
141017. That comment now says "Posted Jul 12, 2005 12:59 UTC (Tue) by
guest petrofsky", but I actually posted it on June 23 at 14:53 -0600.
What happened on July 12 was that the body of the comment was removed
and replaced with "[This comment has been removed by the LWN editors,
sorry]".
Below is the original content of the comment. The apparent reason
for the editing of the comment is that it contained a link to http://scofacts.org/Merkey-Perens-1_1.pdf,
which, at the time the comment was posted, returned a PDF file of the
exhibits to Merkey's complaint, one of which was subsequently sealed
by a court order
later that day. However, the PDF file containing the exhibits was
removed from that URL on the following day, June 23, long before the
comment was edited on July 12.
Original contents of message 14107, Posted Jun 22, 2005 20:53 UTC (Wed):
I can verify that this complaint was really filed. Here are images of
the complaint
and its
exhibits that I obtained from the court's subscribers-only
website. The second exhibit appears to be a 1998 confidential settlement
of two lawsuits between Novell and Merkey. I wrote some
thoughts about the complaint in messages 275549
and 275622
on Yahoo's SCOX message
board. (The latter message references a complaint against Merkey
that was filed in April.)
Images of the complaint and its exhibits
Posted Aug 12, 2005 17:37 UTC (Fri) by petrofsky (guest, #26862)
[Link]
Oops. In the parent message, in reference to message 141017, I wrote
"I actually posted it on June 23", but I meant June 22. Later, I gave
the date again and got it right, but left a digit out of the message
number: "14107" should have been "141017".